12130 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The people who are concerned about losing rating for getting a problem right are going about it the wrong way. You're worried about the result, but not why you aren't as good at tactics as others. Those are the same people you will be playing OTB, so you should be trying to be more like them not changing the rating system so it makes you look similar when you aren't.
To use an exaggarated example... if it takes you 5 minutes to solve a problem that most people can do in 10 seconds, don't you think that says something about your playing strength? Should those two people be rated the same? I dont think so.
That's likely why there's a correlation between timed problems and standard OTB rating. You don't have an infinite amount of time there either. In order to calculate deeply, you have to be able to eliminate bad moves otherwise you'd have to analyze every possibility. People who can quickly spot blitz mode style tactics in their OTB games can eliminate potential bad moves and eliminate possible replies by their opponent.
That makes a lot of sense. Thanks. Apparently, there's something to it because as I said, my blitz tactics rating on chesstempo is right at 1300 and my standard live play rating is mid-1200s. I stopped doing timed tactics on this site because it was so frustrating bouncing back and forth between high 1200s and high 1000s. On chesstempo my blitz tactic rating has slowly and steadily improved over time. Not sure why that is. You get point deductions on chesstempo blitz tactics when you take too long to solve a puzzle (just like here) so I'm not sure why I do better on ChessTemp than I do here. Thanks again.
Personally, I don't really care about the rating. I just don't get why you lose points when you get a problem right. I can understand getting less points but losing points? I'm sure there's a reason for that as well.
Hello everyone !
My Tactics rating is now 2507 here after I solve a huge chess Tactics everyday and I get tired of it , I get only a less improve in blitz or bullet , why solving chess tactics ???????? it give me no improve at all !
i should say not just to you but to every1. avoid playing quick games.
they create flaws in your thinking.
as for your extreme case ,if you want to improve; stop playing blitz and bullet altogether. play standard controls (say 30 min per side) and then see where you stand. analyse each game with engine
that is a really high tactics rating
There are many anomalies with the whole Tactics Trainer system, and this is an example, but plenty more I imagine. I see some people with modest TT rating yet have high blitz/bullet and vice versa (like the OP). I think the Blitz mode just encourages 90% of people to not see/work out the whole line but play move by move and solve it like that. That is why the timer keeps going down for many puzzles. Also many puzzles have dropped a lot in rating compared to just 1-2 years ago. That is why I see some people have TT ratings of 2400-2600 a few years ago, but their ratings today are much LOWER than what they used to be.....these are just some of the things that are obviously wrong with the whole TT system.
LOL I make a lot of auto moves in blitz and bullet I get always a big time advanced , some told me bullet is about who make the fastest moves.
Thankyou everyone for the great info
sorry but you don't really have 2500 in tactics since you obviously cheat. Look at your blitz/bullet where it doesn't shine. Obviously a hacker. get banned please.
if it was true to be 2500 tactics
would i be good
Will i ever reach 1500 ?
by gxtmfa 3 minutes ago
can magnus carlson cross the 3000 elo barrier
by 17rileyc 5 minutes ago
CYCC Chess games
by CP6033 5 minutes ago
Admin Needs Help
by Commander_Riker 19 minutes ago
If Capablanca played Carlsen for the world champion match, who would win?
by ISeeHowYourePinned 24 minutes ago
Scholar's mate defense: Queen trap on 5th move!!!
by Fblthp 25 minutes ago
8/4/2015 - Classic King Hunt
by tboss111 33 minutes ago
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by yureesystem 34 minutes ago
This is why I don't play chess
by DamonevicSmithlov 40 minutes ago
Find the holes in my thinking proces
by agrix 45 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!