10923 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Lots of computer chess programs can easily compete at and above world class level.
Lately I have been playing against Chessmaster set a level thats not too far above me, but still at a point where i can't win a game. I want to know if it would be more beneficial for learning to play the computer at its hardest, world class level. The idea is that I would constantly see and learn superior moves, but would i really get it if the computer is annihalating me instantly?
What are your thoughts? How far above my own level should I play at?
Try playing a level where you score about 40%, and as you get better raise the level accordingly.
Enough success to keep your nose in the game.
I would likely bump it down a level, to where you win SOMEtimes, but not every game. once you get to where you are winning more than half bump it back up. i love CM for that purpose. :)
Playing computers is depressing. I gave up over 15 years ago.
play at a level that you can compete at without being thrashed but u cant beat a human player.....lol
Playing vs. a computer is a little inefficient in terms of trying to improve except
i) When you are practicing won or holding "drawn" games (technique).
ii) When you are gauging/training your ability to play tactically safe chess. (if you miss something, you can be sure the engine will find it)
Humans (at the higher skill levels) bring in the element of psychology into the game and make moves based out of risk assessment/management. A computer will try to play the best move it can find ... a human can try to take you into complications/traps that you will have to struggle to find "only one way out" type solutions in a time-limited manner. Additionally, a human can actually "play the man" and not just the board if the situation warrants it.
i enjoy playing against human players also as i find they test me more than a computer does because u dont know wot random piece will be moved yet
The disconnect epidemic
by Lactation 12 minutes ago
The Unknown Morphy: was he really that strong?
by DeadPoets 14 minutes ago
what should i have done to convert to win
by MASS_ATTACKER 14 minutes ago
The 1855 Official Staunton Chessmen Pictorial Review
by 9kick9 14 minutes ago
Question; why do so few people visit online blogs
by thegreat_patzer 20 minutes ago
My Official Staunton 1851 Reproduction Review
by QuestionableKnight 21 minutes ago
Playing 1. e4 as White
by Davidorcinus 22 minutes ago
9/1/2015 - Reinforcements
by prab_013 24 minutes ago
I need a free study plan
by Squishey 35 minutes ago
Dragon vs Najdorf
by Squishey 40 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!