who do you think will win if an tactical and positional player played a chess mach?

A useless question it is: It would depend on the stength of the players and their preparation, even assuming they were ''equal'' than it would also depend on who was playing white and a whole other large number of circumstances but in definative- I do not know which would win but the loser would be the one to make the ''second to last mistake''. 

Positional :),

Im a positional player myself.. now lets get back to the point,

if the positional player avoid complicated games then he should win..

but zxb995511 is right, it depends on the strength of each player.

Alekhine defeated Capablanca

Kasparov defeated Karpov

Does this mean anything? Hardly.

It's a false dichotomy. There are no purely tactical or purely positional players.

Well I am a positional player as well. I've beat some tactical players and lost to some.

right..

the obvious answer is that the best player would win

I've always thought tactics came at the end of good positional play.

This obsession to group people in tactical and positional players seems absurd to me. Strong players are good in both areas.

yeah tactical and positional are close things ..... are they two good things to have in chess and be good at