16120 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I am a player rated 1400.
Whtat should I do to improve myself?
Should I learn more about openings or endgames?
I know that if I will study tactic problems or learn from strategical games depends on my style.
But, if you are a nice tactical player you can find your oponent's mistakes and reach a better position.
By the other hand, if you are a nice strategical player you can take advantage of the open files etc. and reach again a winning position.
So, you think that I have better study more the openings or the endgames?
Chess is more on strategy, so you must focus on how to play for a strategy like positional chess. Of course, this requires the back up of tactics to support your strategy.
You need to study on both cases, opening and endgame. But it's better for you to start on opening.
Inb4 'spend time on tactics and endgame, don't waste time on openings'.
Will depend on your strengths and weaknesses as to what proportion of each area you need to study, someone would need to look at your games.
If chess were a cage fight, tactical shots are your punches, kicks, and combinations, while positional chess is your angles, ground game, locks, and ring control. Both are necessary for the beginner. Which you choose first depends on where your current weaknesses lie, as in, why do you think you are losing the games you are losing currently, and which can you as an individual benefit the most from?
I have a theory that a good position allows for more tactical shot opportunities, such that one who establishes "side control" on the mat has a greater chance at launching an effective "ground and pound". (I watch a lot of MMA)
Honestly though, for me, tactics aren't really studied, but practiced. I think you can do well just getting an introduction to certain tactical motifs (pins, deflections, skewers / x-rays, attraction, forks, discoveries, etc), and do daily tactics puzzles while studying positional chess (your sillman or nimzo books). On a rudimentary level, consider best move as a combination of positional gains and tactical awareness.
Learning opening books too early is like learning about the opponent's fighting style before mastering your own. Beginners should generally avoid this, unless they are gifted with photographic memory, in which case the world is your oyster. Opening principles should suffice at the moment until you've built enough positional knowledge to comprehend what's the strength and weaknesses of each opening as they are introduced and learned.
Interestingly enough, endgames are more important than openings because the tactical considerations employed are practically applicable throughout a larger portion of the game, as opposed to openings, which apply for 10 moves at most, and with much longer study time and preparation because of all the variations.
From those considerations, you can sort of guess which I prioritize the most (positioning and tactics, then endgames before openings). Doesn't mean it's the "best model" for learning chess, but that's what I, another amateur am doing at the moment.
by tigerprowl a few minutes ago
Erik and 5 suggestions
by RonaldJosephCote a few minutes ago
What to do about Erik ?
by Itude 3 minutes ago
producer of quality fakedocuments
by RonaldJosephCote 5 minutes ago
4/14/2014 - The Good Old Trick
by chesssmart82 6 minutes ago
by RonaldJosephCote 7 minutes ago
Who are your favorite live chess or online chess players to watch?
by PigsOn7th 8 minutes ago
For the Girls on Chess.com...
by 913Glorax12 9 minutes ago
Male & Female Chess Style! Can Statistics Show a Difference! ?
by TheEnglishConquerd 10 minutes ago
my mind is blown that any chess player could be below a 1300
by NathanielGraham 11 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!