8848 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
rdallison
Is anyone else curious why almost none of the Tactics Trainer problems have a pass rate of 60% or higher?
Although there are a handful of problems that do rate between 60% and 65%, it seems that the vast majority never break this barrier.
In all events, I have never yet seen a Tactics Trainer problem with a pass rate higher than 65%. If anyone spots one, please post a link to it on this forum thread!
Baseballfan
My guess is that if your TT rating is too high, and you just aren't seeing the problems with higher pass rates, because they are too far below your own rating.
Hmm... I'm not convinced...
My rating on Tactics Trainer fluctuates between 1350 and 1750. Most of the problems I have seen (2,356 total, or 10% of the total collection) are rated around 1400 to 1500. But I have seen quite a few rated 1300 or lower, and some of those are really, really easy.
After doing so many problems, I would have expected to see at least a few with higher pass rates.
I am not saying this is a problem. I am just commenting on how bizarre it is that even the easiest pin/fork/checkmate problems never seem to break past the 60% or 65% pass rate.
If there is an easy way for somebody to scan the database, it would be interesting to know what the distribution of pass rates really is across all 22,039 problems...
Loomis
Doesn't it indicate that the rating system of the tactics trainer is working?
The point of the rating system is to match a solver with the right level problem -- perhaps they should call it tactics harmony. What does it mean "the right level problem"? If all you get is problems you can already do, what are you going to learn? On the other hand, it is important to reinforce things you do know, so you should already know some of the problems. Also, some of the problems should be things you don't know, but can figure out over the board.
If you get every problem right, your rating goes up until you get some problems that you will miss -- and can learn new things from. If you get every problem wrong your rating will go down until you are on the edge of your ablity -- getting many problems right and some wrong. This seems like the right behavior to me.
The result is that tactics problems are being attempted by a good number of people who have something to learn from them. That is, the rating system is working.
Thanks to Baseballfan and Loomis. Your comments make sense.
Good Game? My rating?
by chessminior a few minutes ago
Interesting game. Please help.
by timab a few minutes ago
Best trolling tactics you legally can do in OTB?
by Stephenson2 2 minutes ago
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by whatupyodog2 2 minutes ago
Knight At Disadvantage But Wins the Match. (Even with Perfect Play From Black)
by Bishopful 2 minutes ago
Sharing your repertoire, good or bad?
by ChazR 3 minutes ago
Deep Fritz 13
by Nshi 3 minutes ago
friendship
by good_nite 6 minutes ago
dandothe vs battmann
by dandothe 6 minutes ago
Best computer for chess analysis?
by TheHandOfGod 7 minutes ago