11419 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Active practice sharpens skills, but neglect dulls one's weapons. Earlier in 2012, I was solving 50-100 tactics problems every week. Some were in books, such as Lev Alburt, Chess Training Pocket Book II or Encyclopedia of Chess Combinations. Most problems were on web sites devoted to tactics training. There were a few sessions on Chess.com.
During one of these session, I was presented with http://www.chess.com/tactics/server?id=146084.I required a mere twelve seconds to execute all four moves of the combination.This morning, rusty from two months of neglecting my training, the problem took me 26 seconds.Without the pressure of the timer, my potential gain from active use of TT would be much reduced. Moreover, I might judge myself to be improving because I easily solved a problem, when in fact I have become weaker.
Yep, I think people that don't consider the timer relevant are trying to blame the tool rather than looking at their weaknesses. If you can't spot simple tactics quickly you just can't play a good game of chess because all your calculation of lines will be slow. Once you have these tactics down you will be given more difficult ones and thus given more time.
E.g. at the 1500 level there are a lot of smothered mates. They rarely take me more than 10 seconds. If you're taking two minutes you may technically be getting it correct but you probably wouldn't see it in a game, because you can't afford to spend that amount of time looking at a single line unless you're almost certain there is something there, which you won't be if you don't know the pattern well enough.
Scandinavian: 1.e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6
by Chicken_Monster a few minutes ago
12/27/2014 - Levenfish-Ryumin, Moscow 1936
by guineapig007 a few minutes ago
You Don't Think Cheating is a Serious Problem?
by LongIslandMark a few minutes ago
Try my Knight Puzzle
by ldrennan819 3 minutes ago
Computer users on tournament 5 minutes up to longer time controls
by sftac 3 minutes ago
by trysts 9 minutes ago
ღ OFFICIAL 2014 Chess.com Awards ღ
by Fresh_from_the_Oven 9 minutes ago
IF I OWN THE CENTER THAT MEANS I OWN YOU!!!
by I_Am_Second 14 minutes ago
Why do you like playing chess?
by omega_supreme 15 minutes ago
If You Could Fix One Thing On Chess.com, What Would It Be?
by Feufollet 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!