14435 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
a player should never have rating points deducted for solving a tactics problem too slowly. this (generally) does not reflect a game situation. at worst, a slow solution should result in +1 point. in addition, it is not good to rush people while in conceptual training. finally, to penalize a person for the correct solution (no matter how slowly they come to it) is igoring the power of positive reinforcement.
Fourth, I for one am winding up with an endless stream of 600 level puzzles that are teaching me nothign and will continue to teach me nothing until I eventually pick up the skill to absorb an entire chessboard accurately from scratch, inside of five or six seconds. It's going to be a while, is all I can say.
You're not being penalized.
You didn't spot it very quickly, this means you found the problem hard, so your rating is adjusted appropriately so you get easier problems in the future, just like if you got it wrong.
The penalty for getting it slowly is less than the penalty for getting it wrong.
But yeah, it is designed for quick pattern recognition, I've heard david pruess recommend that you don't spend more than half a minute (not sure on exact time) looking at each puzzle anyway, because you're trying to train pattern recognition, not problem solving.
your point is well taken. for some, pattern recognition comes with solving the problem (we're hands on players, not rote). so, in a sense, we're both right.
Yeah, the higher problems are in a different world. Down here it is simply a question of finding the pin/fork and making sure you're not hanging anything first.
To the original point - changing the system so that a correct answer is awarded +1 would just raise the rating pool, would it not? People's ratings would increase on average, so the problems would decrease less and everything would just rise.
EDIT: But getting the answer right would be much more important, which is the main point. Duh.
I think if there was a way to turn off the timing feature, it would help out. With no time pressure, you can look more thoroughly.
i kind of like the timing feature...but again it is kinda a pain :) but i think its good for learning skillz :)
very good. simple. it gives the options to those of us who want more time to think about specific probelms. i don't know if the chess.com powers that be read this stuff. i hope they do. thanks.P.S.:I LOOKED AT THIS AGAIN. ALTHOUGH YOU CAN TURN OFF THE TIMER IT'S ONLY BEFORE THE PROBLEM IS SHOWN. IF IT COULD BE TURNED OFF AFTER YOU SEE A SEEMINGLY COMPLEX POSITION, THEN IT WOULD HELP THE LEARNING PROCESS FOR A LOT OF US.
Changing the settings only works for premium members, not free like me.
Your analysis chess set
by kenardi a few minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by TheronG12 a few minutes ago
When a coward refuses to resign.......
by Tiger-Woodie 3 minutes ago
French tarrasch open against +150
by Equiv 4 minutes ago
Aborting live games
by Daryl_F 4 minutes ago
by TurboFish 4 minutes ago
KG accepted question
by ipcress12 5 minutes ago
by InfernoImpact 6 minutes ago
Digital chess clock
by kenardi 7 minutes ago
by TurboFish 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!