15798 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
like King Kong, only played him once.
Was Capablanca not socially adept?
Help me out, here.
This argument is too broad. Specifically what types of social settings? If a highly trained person is amongst those at work who are conversing simply to pass time and the conversation is meaningless, then yes the smart people may choose not to engage as it is a waste of time. Conversely, surrounded by like minded persons, that same person may be highly engaged while the so called "social" person doesnt know what to talk to around these highly trained persons. Viewpoints dont hold for all situations. I think Go and chess are highly valuable in terms of training persons about what situations and people to avoid. I specifically find Go though to be much more valuable in terms of dealing with social situations such as work that a person is subjected to as far as not being able to confront social situations directly, but to use deception so as to protect oneself. I act friendly at work simply to get along and protect myself, not because I want to have anything to do with the people I work with which for the most part I intensely dislike. So if Go or chess time investment is a way to deal with these "social" aka F.O.S. people at work or elsewhere, then it is time well spent.
i wonder how many chess players with overdeveloped skill really post in forums
I was so happy when poker became big, because all the Type-A personality jerks from the chess club disappeared.
How about those guys that slam their pieces down every single time? It's like 1.e4 g6!!!! with a big thud.
Ever know any guys like that?
Yes, he also used to slam the clock--harder and harder as his position got worse--and wrecked a couple of the club's cheapo clocks...off to pokerland!
actually i find poker slightly amusing sometimes. Even so its probably all prearanged for the cameras.
Dragon vs Najdorf
by Gilasaurus a few minutes ago
How to beat an IM
by Jenium a few minutes ago
Why are women not as successful as men in chess?
by rickdaniels52 5 minutes ago
Finally a blunder-free game?
by Luigipro94 17 minutes ago
by wanmokewan 18 minutes ago
Will I be able to reach Master level?
by Enter-The-Tuna 22 minutes ago
Millionaire Chess 2!!
by EscherehcsE 41 minutes ago
don't study openings until level 2000?
by Andre_Harding 44 minutes ago
What strength can you archieve without being able to play blindfold?
by MrMarkowitch 45 minutes ago
Wo sind die deutschen???
by Enter-The-Tuna 47 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!