11064 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
... enjoy problem solving. (Not that those who enjoy problem solving will necessarily like chess).
Is this a fair statement? It seems that a game can be summed up this way... we as players are faced with one problem after another and we try to find the best solution. Everything from how do I survive my nagging disadvantage to how do I convert my winning position.
It seems that someone who was in it for the competition, or to put on airs on intelligence, or even for the creative/beauty side of it wouldn't last long if the love for problem solving wasn't at the core of it all. What do you think?
I think you would be right if chess was a single player game. However, I think the ability to tolerate and/or thrive in the face of competition and pressure to succeed plays just as big of a role. I've heard an arguement that the main reason that there are not many female players at the top level is that the competitive environment that chess tends to brew up does not appeal to the female psychology, but otherwise they are as capable as men are in the game and probably have just as much enjoyment with problem solving.
@OP: Yes I completely agree. I like to think of every move/decision in chess as its own logical problem, as if it were a brain teaser in a book. Sometimes these problems have different goals. In endgames, the nature of the position often results in finding a way to queen a pawn. In openings the problem to solve might be finding a way to reach your ideal position by gaining tempi on the opponent. I think if more people thought about chess this way, they wouldn't be as frustrated by it.
It is the ideal game for logical, abstract problem solving. The irony is that the game is so difficult that it can often overwhelm, frustrate, and discourage even people who (generally) love problem solving.
I agree too. I always thought of chess as a good exercise in problem solving. A chess game is a mutating puzzle that changes with each player's move. Each move, no matter what the piece, is significant and can completely change the outcome of the game.
On the other hand... I think a lot of chess players LOVE competition! There are a lot of determined chess players who stick with playing chess whether they are winning or losing games, just for the fun of it, or just as an exercise for their brains. I believe some people simply stop playing the game for lack of succes in winning... it does seem to seperate who really loves the game and who...well... I don't know really. I just know that I love chess and will continue to play until the day I die.
Great Topic! I think about this sort of thing often. I often wonder what other games compare to chess in this "problem solving" way.
I like posing problems more then having to solve them.
Certainly the mystery is an alluring quality of chess. I need continual cerebral challenge and stimulation or I feel like I am in a mental straight jacket. The pseudo infinity of chess provides an ample supply of all of these.
like to have to solve problems in order to win a game. Chess is just one big puzzle with many answers to it; you chose if you want to solve it or enjoy trying.
Who posts this stuff?
I guess it's unfair to leave out competition as a reason to stick to chess. Still, it takes a certain kind of person to use chess for their competition instead of, say, sports.
I completely disagree. If that were the case then people would be indifferent between playing chess online and playing chess in real life. There is competition, the beauty of the game, the community, chess news, etc.
I've never thought about it before you asked this waffle. Quite frankly, I have been a competitive gamer all my life, be it sports, poker, video games, ect. I love a challenge, and more so a challenge that comes with an opportunity to destroy my opponent(s). I do feel that the love of problem solving does come into play, but personally I enjoy the competitive aspect of chess more than anything else.
For me, i'd agree, i like the beauty of searching for the hidden win (or .. as you mentioned ... saving a bad game), i like the artistic element of chess, much more than competitive chess (which i hardly like at all and is basically why my career was only 3 years otb).
Losing is better than winning.
by losingmove 5 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by DjonniDerevnja 10 minutes ago
5/4/2015 - Mate in 4
by latoch 10 minutes ago
by PowerfulGod 16 minutes ago
Deep blue vs kasparov
by MarkProb 23 minutes ago
Why play chess? There are unbeatable computers out there.
by WhoIsHe17 25 minutes ago
1800 target in two months?
by Chess_Beginner2 32 minutes ago
ask a professional chess player anything
by Chess_Beginner2 37 minutes ago
Where did I go wrong?
by Mozekgames 47 minutes ago
Chess coaching for under 1400's
by GMrisingJCLmember1 59 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!