^ Click here to remove ads! ^

the rules state it's allowed

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
21st May 2008, 08:32pm
#1
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291

any of you cheaters or people in possession of chess engine software wanna play me? challenge me and name the game fritz. i'll crush you. or we'll draw. or one of us will win by a slim margin.

 now to the real reason i'm posting, anyone know of chess clubs in toronto? 


22nd May 2008, 12:38am
#2
by joannernZ
zamboanga city Philippines
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 49
yabang...
22nd May 2008, 01:38pm
#3
by tns
Portland United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 39
You should be keelhauled for using such a large font.
22nd May 2008, 07:10pm
#4
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291
tns wrote: You should be keelhauled for using such a large font.

 you should be keelhauled for making me have to look up the definition of keelhauled.


22nd May 2008, 07:24pm
#5
by Rael
Calgary, Alberta Canada
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 2789

What does keehauled mean? ... since you already looked it up Timmay.


22nd May 2008, 07:30pm
#6
by ericg65
Texas United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 28

Keelhauling was a severe form of corporal punishment meted out to sailors at sea.


looked it up on wikipedia lol
22nd May 2008, 07:38pm
#7
by mrwrangler
Fort Worth United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 51
You get to inspect the barnacles on the hull of yhe ship real closely. You stood a better than 50 % chance of survival.
22nd May 2008, 07:44pm
#8
by LDSSDL
Tinton Falls United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 149
timmaylivinalie wrote: tns wrote: You should be keelhauled for using such a large font.

 you should be keelhauled for making me have to look up the definition of keelhauled.


 ^LOL I'm really tempted to look it up now


22nd May 2008, 08:30pm
#9
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291
Rael wrote:

What does keehauled mean? ... since you already looked it up Timmay.


keel·haul   // ", "6"); interfaceflash.addParam("loop", "false"); interfaceflash.addParam("quality", "high"); interfaceflash.addParam("menu", "false"); interfaceflash.addParam("salign", "t"); interfaceflash.addParam("FlashVars", "soundUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.lexico.com%2Fdictionary%2Faudio%2Fahd4%2FK%2FK0028100.mp3"); interfaceflash.write(); // ]]>
<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/audio.html/ahd4WAV/K0028100/keelhauled" target="_blank"><img src="http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif" border="0" /></a>  Audio Help   (kēl'hôl')  Pronunciation Key 
tr.v.   keel·hauled, keel·haul·ing, keel·hauls
  1. Nautical To discipline by dragging under the keel of a ship.
  2. To rebuke harshly.
or what ericq said :P

22nd May 2008, 08:33pm
#10
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291
mrwrangler wrote: You get to inspect the barnacles on the hull of yhe ship real closely. You stood a better than 50 % chance of survival.

 i think i'd rather take my chances with beheading :P


22nd May 2008, 08:45pm
#11
by Duffer1965
Alexandria, VA United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 256

For those who did not know what "keelhauled" meant, please rent more pirate movies. They are good for the soul. Or something.

Personally, I think keelhauling is too severe a punishment merely for the gross abuse of using an absurdly large font. Usually ear cropping and nose splitting do the trick. Besides, where are we going to get a ship to haul someone under the keel? 


23rd May 2008, 12:59am
#12
by LydiaBlonde
Zagreb Croatia
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 318
Is it a joke? How it can be that somebody (timmaylivinalie) has ZERO  rating points? Surprised
23rd May 2008, 03:14am
#13
by Duffer1965
Alexandria, VA United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 256
timmaylivinalie wrote: 

 


 how about i just pirate more movies, that could help too, no?

i chose the large font for the kids..kids are stupid and need big letters and i wanted them to be able to read my post..those lil illiterate bastards


 It's a bit ironic that you refer to your intended audience as stupid and claim that the font size you chose was for legibility. Because the line spacing is so inadequate, your ascenders and descenders are running into each other. There is far too little white space for type that size. Also, readers expect to see initial letters of senteces capitalized; your lower case initials make the lack of white space even more difficult to read.


23rd May 2008, 03:56am
#14
by ewige
Akron, OH United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 13
LydiaBlonde wrote: Is it a joke? How it can be that somebody (timmaylivinalie) has ZERO  rating points?

It's no joke, he worked awhile on attaining that.


23rd May 2008, 04:02am
#15
by silentfilmstar13
Medford, OR United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 2073
Duffer1965 wrote: timmaylivinalie wrote: 

 


 how about i just pirate more movies, that could help too, no?

i chose the large font for the kids..kids are stupid and need big letters and i wanted them to be able to read my post..those lil illiterate bastards


 It's a bit ironic that you refer to your intended audience as stupid and claim that the font size you chose was for legibility. Because the line spacing is so inadequate, your ascenders and descenders are running into each other. There is far too little white space for type that size. Also, readers expect to see initial letters of senteces capitalized; your lower case initials make the lack of white space even more difficult to read.


 what?! i can't understand you. you used too small a font and too many capital letters. please correct this so i'll know what you said. thanks!

 

 -little kid


23rd May 2008, 07:31am
#16
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291
Duffer1965 wrote: timmaylivinalie wrote: 

 


 how about i just pirate more movies, that could help too, no?

i chose the large font for the kids..kids are stupid and need big letters and i wanted them to be able to read my post..those lil illiterate bastards


 It's a bit ironic that you refer to your intended audience as stupid and claim that the font size you chose was for legibility. Because the line spacing is so inadequate, your ascenders and descenders are running into each other. There is far too little white space for type that size. Also, readers expect to see initial letters of senteces capitalized; your lower case initials make the lack of white space even more difficult to read.


 all apologies duffman!i' m juss allergic. to proper grammar" and i detest capital' letters(

                    bthew? if the post  was intended juss 4 kids as/ ur implyin i'dv'e included picshers of clowns and nemo's and crap.


23rd May 2008, 07:34am
#17
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291
silentfilmstar13 wrote: Duffer1965 wrote: timmaylivinalie wrote: 

 


 how about i just pirate more movies, that could help too, no?

i chose the large font for the kids..kids are stupid and need big letters and i wanted them to be able to read my post..those lil illiterate bastards


 It's a bit ironic that you refer to your intended audience as stupid and claim that the font size you chose was for legibility. Because the line spacing is so inadequate, your ascenders and descenders are running into each other. There is far too little white space for type that size. Also, readers expect to see initial letters of senteces capitalized; your lower case initials make the lack of white space even more difficult to read.


 what?! i can't understand you. you used too small a font and too many capital letters. please correct this so i'll know what you said. thanks!

 

 -little kid


 rofl!


23rd May 2008, 07:37am
#18
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291
ewige wrote: LydiaBlonde wrote: Is it a joke? How it can be that somebody (timmaylivinalie) has ZERO  rating points?

It's no joke, he worked awhile on attaining that.


 ewige is right. it took me more than 3 days of work.


23rd May 2008, 07:37am
#19
by excalibur8
Barnsley England
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 247
Didn't realise there was a Moronic Category on this forum.Surprised
23rd May 2008, 07:39am
#20
by timmaylivinalie
the couch Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 291
excalibur8 wrote: Didn't realise there was a Moronic Category on this forum.

 and what a surprise that you found it!


« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.