The Slump

Jump to forum:
 
3rd August 2007, 10:17pm
#1
by Howlingbanshee
Bedford, TX United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 120

Do you ever feel when you make one bad move or about to lose one game, you second guess yourself time and time again?  You just feel like every move you are about to make is wrong.

3rd August 2007, 10:33pm
#2
by Cheswina
south africa South Africa
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 3
OOOOO - I know exactly how you feel!  It's as if suddenly all your plans come crashing around your ears..
3rd August 2007, 10:53pm
#3
by piemonkeydude
Bayamon Puerto Rico
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 374
same here, like when u lose just one, u think it's just one loss, but it happens again, and again, and again.
3rd August 2007, 11:12pm
#4
by chessiq
Malawi
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 654

I do - sometimes - and my explanation is that I try not to make a mistake again. In a way, I become overly cautious. I don't "feel like every move I am about to make is wrong" - I just don't want it to be wrong. I think there is a difference. If you feel like it's wrong, it means that you suspect that there is something wrong with it and you are trying to find the wrong thing. You focus on the negative; judgment has been passed. On the other hand, if you don't want it to be wrong, as in my case, I am looking for a better move, or I am just double checking my decision. I am focusing on the upside. Very thin line, but it's there. I think it is healthy, every time you find a move, to double check it; to retrace your thinking line or pattern, just to be sure. I don't always do it, but I know it's a good thing.

Glad to hear/see that we (chess players) share "feelings". 

3rd August 2007, 11:17pm
#5
by Cheswina
south africa South Africa
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 3
lol - yeah, that we're not just automatons...hehe
4th August 2007, 05:51am
#6
by justice_avocado
Columbus, OH United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 495
i feel hungry
4th August 2007, 10:00am
#7
by Howlingbanshee
Bedford, TX United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 120

I haven't heard the word automaton in a while.  Nice choice of words.

4th August 2007, 10:06am
#8
by Manoj
India India
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 18
yeah as long as we are not playing with programs the opponent may also make a blunder "To err is human" its a safe bet to avoid exchanges when you think ur position is bad.
4th August 2007, 10:37am
#9
by justice_avocado
Columbus, OH United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 495
yeah, seriously. automatons don't get hungry.
4th August 2007, 11:38am
#10
by RBurns3167
Boulder, CO United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 11
I'd hardly say that when I lose a piece I second guess my every move, rather I find that I usually switch my posture.  Most of the time I play aggressively, if I lose one of the pieces that I was counting on I find that I will fall back and take a more defensive strategy.  The downside is this tends to prevent one from capitalizing upon your opponent's errors.  It would be curious to see if going on the offensive would allow one to gain the initiative and force your opponent to slip up.
4th August 2007, 11:45am
#11
by Etienne
Montreal, Quebec Canada
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 780
It happens to me when I'm winning, but it's not an easy win, and it would be very easy to lead it to a draw...
4th August 2007, 11:46am
#12
by batgirl
NC United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 4451
Howlingbanshee wrote:

I haven't heard the word automaton in a while.  Nice choice of words.


because you haven't read this: http://www.chess.com/chessopedia/view/turk

4th August 2007, 11:49am
#13
by RichardHayden
Ashburn, VA United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 250
batgirl wrote: Howlingbanshee wrote:

I haven't heard the word automaton in a while.  Nice choice of words.


because you haven't read this: http://www.chess.com/chessopedia/view/turk


 There's a well written book on The Turk by Tom Standage.

 

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/books/05/30/the.turk/ 

5th August 2007, 08:34am
#14
by Manoj
India India
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 18
RBurns3167 wrote:  The downside is this tends to prevent one from capitalizing upon your opponent's errors.  It would be curious to see if going on the offensive would allow one to gain the initiative and force your opponent to slip up.

The problem with attacking with a weak position is that it leads to easy end game for the opponent. Hence Its better to wait like a python.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.