Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Threefold Repetition

Jump to forum:
 
15th June 2008, 12:20am
#1
by greatexcalibur
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3825

Dear all

I am a new member, just joined 3 days ago and I found it really exciting here..:) Wish we can share so much about chess, because I am just a casual player and I just play chess naturally (not literally), I do not know much about opening and other theories. Therefore, hope you all can help me learning so much about chess.. Smile

First question from me is about threefold repetition.

Why "Threefold repetition" did not work here? I played chess online against Shando1989 (you can see on my online chess), and have already done it with Kb7 three times, but it did not "draw automatically" and when I offered to my opponent, he refused, even though I have already mentioned the threefold repetition. How could this happened?

Please advise and many thanks. Smile

greatexcalibur

15th June 2008, 01:05am
#2
by kosmeg
Lamia Greece
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 538
Three-fold repetition is NOT when YOU make 3 times the same moves. It's when a position is repeated 3 times and that means that both players made the same moves.
15th June 2008, 01:10am
#3
by greatexcalibur
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3825

Thanks Kosmeg, yup, sorry I meant positions, NOT moves.. :)

How about this article on the game between Fischer versus Petrosian 1971, they didn't repeat the same moves, each moved differently, but at the end Fischer can claim draw due to he repeated his Queen position at e2 three times.

Please see : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threefold_repetition


15th June 2008, 01:48am
#4
by BFM
Tallinn Estonia
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 337

It's a common mistake to believe that both players have to make same moves three times in a row for this rule to make effect, actually only the position counts and it doesn't have to occur as a result of repetition of same moves from both sides, as the Fischer versus Petrosian shows.

The position in a game is a term that describes where all the pieces of both players lay, what are the possible moves that the player can play(ability to castle, play en passant etc.) and whos turn it is to move.

If all of those conditions of two positions are the same, then the position is the same.


15th June 2008, 01:57am
#5
by greatexcalibur
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3825

Thanks BFM, then can you please explain in my game with Shando1989, which rule(s) was / were not established? (according to my last reply in our group forum, explaining Petrosian's move that only occured twice by his Rook on d5).

Thanks a million.. :)


15th June 2008, 02:22am
#6
by BFM
Tallinn Estonia
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 337

let me try to clarify this to you here as well (as my english isn't perfect, the more the better:)) - Petrosians rook move occured twice but the position where this rook was situated at square d5 (and his queen at f6 and fischers rook at f4 etc.) occured three times in the game, and that is what matters.

 There never occured a position in your game, when both your and Shando1989's pieces would have been situated at same squares three times.


15th June 2008, 03:18am
#7
by greatexcalibur
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3825

Now I understand.

In my game, it wasn't established because Shando's King made different move, even though my King was in the same position for 3 times.

Thanks a million BFM for your clear and good explanation as well as your perfect English, instead mine that very worst.. :)

And thanks also for PerfectGent


15th June 2008, 04:29am
#8
by FreeCat
Barcelona Catalonia
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 147
PerfectGent wrote:

and a final point.

3 fold repetition is not an automatic draw.

you have to claim it because if you choose you can let play go on.


 And what if you claim the draw and your opponent doesn't accept it?


15th June 2008, 05:37am
#9
by greatexcalibur
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3825
FreeCat wrote: PerfectGent wrote:

and a final point.

3 fold repetition is not an automatic draw.

you have to claim it because if you choose you can let play go on.


 And what if you claim the draw and your opponent doesn't accept it?


If valid threefold repetition has been established, your opponent cannot refuse the offer, and the game ended with draw.


15th June 2008, 06:07am
#10
by benws
NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1575

here's how it works, greatexcalibur:

when the server detects that the same position has occured three times, the "offer draw" button becomes a "claim draw" button. if you click that, the game automatically becomes a draw and your opponent cannot refuse. hope this helps. 


15th June 2008, 09:59pm
#11
by BaronDerKilt
East of Omaha United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 458
Or in a live OTB tournament (not on computer), if an opponent does not acknowlege your draw claim by threefold repetition, you would just have to summon the Tournament Director to make an official draw claim, who would verify that the position did occur three times in the manner specified by the rule, and he would then rule it a draw. 
23rd July 2008, 09:39pm
#12
by tbonius
Hobart Australia
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 642

Does the claim draw button only appear immediately after the three-fold repetition? Can you continue the game, for example, then blunder badly later on and still claim the draw?

24th July 2008, 05:04am
#13
by greatexcalibur
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3825

Torsten, to be honest, I haven't tried in here.. But, I think the draw will only offered and can be claimed once. If you didn't take it, then you continue the game as usual and cannot claim after several moves unles the threefold repetition comes again and you will be offered again..

20th December 2010, 10:09am
#14
by mushak
worthing United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2010
Member Points: 5

Ive been struggling with the same confusian over the Petrosian fischer game and one of my own, noww Im beginning to understand1 thankyou guys

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.