9672 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The link below is to a 10/0 game I played earlier today (sry, I don't know how to put the game directly in my post). I realize that I made a lot of mistakes, especially toward the end when I was in time trouble (I ended up losing on time). But what I wanted to ask is, moves 22 - 31 are clearly an example of threefold repitition (actually closer to fivefold), yet the game was not drawn immediately. Does threefold repitition not exist in blitz or something?
You have to claim draw and it will be given - threefold repitition draw isn't given automatically.
You have to claim draw and it will be given - threefold repitition isn't given automatically.
Really? so that's why...lol
yes but you have the claim the draw, Click the small "draw" button next to "resign" when you are about to repeat for the 3rd time.
O, thanks a lot! At least I'll know what to do next time.
ok. So can you just randomly move the same piece back and forth 3 times and no matter what you can claim a draw?? That sounds kinda cheap...
ohhhh ok that makes ALOT more sense. haha sorry
Three-fold repetition means that the same exact position is on the board with the same side to move.
Theoretically, you could have have the same position 10 moves apart each time and it still end in a draw if each time it is counted the pieces are in exactly the same position with the same person to move at each repetition.
weeeeeeerd that seems hard to do
Well, the most common occurrence of threefold repetition is three consecutive anyway, but the rule does specify not only must it be the same position and the same side to move, but also both sides must have the same moves available. So if one side loses the right to castle after two repetitions but before the third, the count starts over, and a position with the option of capturing en passant can never be the first repetition.
The ONLY "automatic" draws are stalemate on the board and a draw offer accepted by the opponent. Repetition and the 50-move rule must be claimed.
No, it's not 3 moves sequence but 3 same positions.
Not really, an important distinction which probably made my opponent miss it:
8/30/2014 - Nimzowitsch - Marshall
by liujiale a few minutes ago
Chess greatness CANNOT be taught or learned……
by With_every_step 16 minutes ago
Is the way I'm taking for tactics correct?
by vittyvirus 19 minutes ago
Artur Yusupov's Nine Books
by Chicken_Monster 26 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by Chessislife2013 29 minutes ago
by ghostofmaroczy 33 minutes ago
Why would anyone play the French defense?
by FirebrandX 35 minutes ago
by wu1010 46 minutes ago
Sinquefield Cup 2014
by LuftWaffles 64 minutes ago
World Chess.com Correspondence Chess Championship Match (MSC157 vs. _)
by Pulpofeira 74 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!