Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Too old to improve?


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #61

    Kingpatzer

    e4nf3 wrote:

    Yes, it is doable.

    And I have to laugh that you are only in your forties and are feeling "old". I know...I know...I've been there. And I have three children in their forties who are feeling "old".

    I'm still working on improving. My goal is 1800...I'm getting there. I probably could hit 2000...but I don't know that I want to put in the additional work. There are, after all, other priorities that I have.

    Compared to my Grandmother, I'm young. But when it comes to neurology, I'm "old" in the sense that what my neurons are doing now is not what they were doing when I was young. And no amount of telling myself I'm only as young as I feel will change that :)

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #62

    e4nf3

    No, I realize all that. That's why my golf is going downhill, as well (mostly just distance at the T-box...I chip, pitch and putt better than ever!).

    BUT...I'm still within my potential at chess.

    And, so are you. You even said so. Smile

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #63

    Conflagration_Planet

    http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2002/02/50724   Good article on it. Get exercise too.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #64

    superiorbeing

    General health has a lot more to do with learning ability than age.  Most older people who have trouble learning are usually in poor health. 

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #65

    AlCzervik

    Holy cow, folks! We just heard from a superior being! He/she (it?) must be right!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #66

    e4nf3

    Here's the thing...

    I played chess as a teenager. I read books. There were no computers back then. I studied, practiced...and I would usually win (this was casual, not tournament, so I'm not bragging).

    Today, after a 40 year vacation (mostly) from chess, I am a better play than the young fellow I was.

    This is because for the last two years, I have been studying/practicing about two hours per day (and I know that that isn't so much by those who are far better at chess than I am).

    I didn't have the time to do this back then. Also, I am older and wiser in ways that give me some advantages.

    If some of you guys in your 30ies or 40ies think you are getting dim witted...maybe you are right, in your case.

    Hell, some people are so dim witted that they should never have taken up chess in the first place. (lol) 

    Now that I've just insulted more than half the people here...I gotta run.Innocent

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #67

    AndyClifton

    TMIMITW wrote:

    Holy cow, folks! We just heard from a superior being! He/she (it?) must be right!

    The woods are full of em around here (just ask sapientdust).

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #68

    AndyClifton

    TonyH wrote:

    I asked a local master if Reshvesky, who was in his 80s at that time, was any good still since he was about 2300 at the time but no where near the strength he was at his prime. 

    I find it a bit hard to believe that Reshevsky's rating ever got that low...

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #69

    PatzerLars

    You're never too old, until you die.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #70

    AndyClifton

    And then you're just old enough.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #71

    AndyClifton

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #72

    cabadenwurt

    Info on Reshevsky from Chess Life ( Nov.2011 ). In 1990, at age 79, he played in the US Open held in Jacksonville. He went 7 out of 9 there, including a Draw against IM John Donaldson. By this time he may well have forgotten more about Chess than most players could ever hope to learn  lol.   

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #73

    TonyH

    not maybe, definitely!! Laughing he was simply one of the best.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #74

    DENVERHIGH

    Too old to improve @ chess? Or too old to learn anything?

    I just learned the basics to make and design web pages. I'm learning new Css, html5 programing and javascript.

    I'm learning cosmology, physics and writing. I'm only 74 years old and my brain is probably half empty or half full.

     I don't think you ever get to old to learn chess. It's mostly repeatability of what works and what doesn't work.

    You just have to retain it. But if you can't remember it, write it down.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #75

    goldendog

    TonyH wrote:

    An interesting story. Back in the 80s when I first started to play against serious players I asked a local master if Reshvesky, who was in his 80s at that time, was any good still since he was about 2300 at the time

    2300? No, you're way off. The last rating for Sammy, 1991, is 2415 FIDE according to my megabase.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #76

    e4nf3

    Good to know.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #77

    billwall

    See my article on older chess players.

     

    http://www.chess.com/article/view/older-chess-players

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #78

    TonyH

     it was USCF rating he was fairly inactive at the time and didnt play many FIDE events but I clearly remember 2300ish ( wonder if i can dig up old uscf rating lists sometime at the club) Which is why I brought up the question to the master.  its been a few decades so the exact timing I am not sure of but the rating is irrelevent anyway...

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #79

    AndyClifton

    Reshevsky's lowest USCF rating was 2426 (he got it back up to nearly 2500 btw just before he died).

    And at the age of 70 Sammy almost won the US Championship.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #80

    BorgQueen

    Damn that is impressive.  I think I am losing it at 45.

    Perhaps I am and it's not the age ^_^


Back to Top

Post your reply: