10493 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Yes, it is doable.
And I have to laugh that you are only in your forties and are feeling "old". I know...I know...I've been there. And I have three children in their forties who are feeling "old".
I'm still working on improving. My goal is 1800...I'm getting there. I probably could hit 2000...but I don't know that I want to put in the additional work. There are, after all, other priorities that I have.
Compared to my Grandmother, I'm young. But when it comes to neurology, I'm "old" in the sense that what my neurons are doing now is not what they were doing when I was young. And no amount of telling myself I'm only as young as I feel will change that :)
No, I realize all that. That's why my golf is going downhill, as well (mostly just distance at the T-box...I chip, pitch and putt better than ever!).
BUT...I'm still within my potential at chess.
And, so are you. You even said so.
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2002/02/50724 Good article on it. Get exercise too.
General health has a lot more to do with learning ability than age. Most older people who have trouble learning are usually in poor health.
Holy cow, folks! We just heard from a superior being! He/she (it?) must be right!
Here's the thing...
I played chess as a teenager. I read books. There were no computers back then. I studied, practiced...and I would usually win (this was casual, not tournament, so I'm not bragging).
Today, after a 40 year vacation (mostly) from chess, I am a better play than the young fellow I was.
This is because for the last two years, I have been studying/practicing about two hours per day (and I know that that isn't so much by those who are far better at chess than I am).
I didn't have the time to do this back then. Also, I am older and wiser in ways that give me some advantages.
If some of you guys in your 30ies or 40ies think you are getting dim witted...maybe you are right, in your case.
Hell, some people are so dim witted that they should never have taken up chess in the first place. (lol)
Now that I've just insulted more than half the people here...I gotta run.
The woods are full of em around here (just ask sapientdust).
I asked a local master if Reshvesky, who was in his 80s at that time, was any good still since he was about 2300 at the time but no where near the strength he was at his prime.
I find it a bit hard to believe that Reshevsky's rating ever got that low...
You're never too old, until you die.
And then you're just old enough.
Info on Reshevsky from Chess Life ( Nov.2011 ). In 1990, at age 79, he played in the US Open held in Jacksonville. He went 7 out of 9 there, including a Draw against IM John Donaldson. By this time he may well have forgotten more about Chess than most players could ever hope to learn lol.
not maybe, definitely!! he was simply one of the best.
Too old to improve @ chess? Or too old to learn anything?
I'm learning cosmology, physics and writing. I'm only 74 years old and my brain is probably half empty or half full.
I don't think you ever get to old to learn chess. It's mostly repeatability of what works and what doesn't work.
You just have to retain it. But if you can't remember it, write it down.
An interesting story. Back in the 80s when I first started to play against serious players I asked a local master if Reshvesky, who was in his 80s at that time, was any good still since he was about 2300 at the time
2300? No, you're way off. The last rating for Sammy, 1991, is 2415 FIDE according to my megabase.
Good to know.
See my article on older chess players.
it was USCF rating he was fairly inactive at the time and didnt play many FIDE events but I clearly remember 2300ish ( wonder if i can dig up old uscf rating lists sometime at the club) Which is why I brought up the question to the master. its been a few decades so the exact timing I am not sure of but the rating is irrelevent anyway...
Reshevsky's lowest USCF rating was 2426 (he got it back up to nearly 2500 btw just before he died).
And at the age of 70 Sammy almost won the US Championship.
Damn that is impressive. I think I am losing it at 45.
Perhaps I am and it's not the age ^_^
CONTEST: Caption this Image of Anand & Carlsen
by red-lady 2 minutes ago
If You were Doing Life Which 5 Books Would You Keep To Make Your game Strong?
by NomadicKnight 3 minutes ago
Alekhine's Defense Brilliancy - destroyed a guy in only 7 moves :O
by TheGrobe 4 minutes ago
Bad Day for the Heavyweight
by Expirc 6 minutes ago
Other words/sentence for Checkmate could be ... ?
by NomadicKnight 7 minutes ago
How to insert a chess game into a post using an iPad?
by TheGrobe 8 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by Somebodysson 11 minutes ago
is this player better then Magnus
by woodrow 12 minutes ago
Idea about the difference of Fide rating and chess.com rating for a player
by chessph 13 minutes ago
5/30/2013 - Imaginative Mating Idea
by jonate 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!