5928 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Keldorn
Hi all. I think I have a quite interesting question. But before I present it, please take a look at the following position:
Now, please imagine this situation on a tournament for instance. Let's say that white has already pushed c8, and then touched a Queen next to the board, only to realise that promoting to a Queen leads to an immediate draw. Can he change his mind and put a Rook on the board, or is he forced to make a mistake due to the rules of touched pieces?
rooperi
This is a really interesting question.
And what if he pushes the pawn, and announces "Queen!" without touching anything?
chry3841
f it says queen it's not counted as a move, it happened. It happened to me too that my opponent sayd check before making his move and he could move to a square wich didn't was check according to the arbiter
Sigmoid_Flexure
From FIDE rules:
4.4
If a player having the move:
a.
deliberately touches his king and rook he must castle on that side if it is legal to do so
b.
deliberately touches a rook and then his king he is not allowed to castle on that side on that move and the situation shall be governed by Article 4.3.a
c.
intending to castle, touches the king or king and rook at the same time, but castling on that side is illegal, the player must make another legal move with his king (which may include castling on the other side). If the king has no legal move, the player is free to make any legal move
d.
promotes a pawn, the choice of the piece is finalised, when the piece has touched the square of promotion.
So you can pick anything up as long as you don't put it down, it sounds like.
rubygabbi
From the FIDE Rulebook:
Article 6: The Completion Of The Move
6.4
in the case of the promotion of a pawn, when the pawn has been removed from the chessboard and the player's hand has released the new piece after placing it on the promotion square. If the player has released from his hand the pawn that has reached the promotion square, the move is not yet completed, but the player no longer has the right to play the pawn to another square.
So, we see that a verbal announcement is irrelevant.Only when the player releases the newly promoted piece on the promotion square, is the move considered complete.
If it's in there twice they must mean it.
Baseball could learn a lot from the concise chess and soccer rules. Go, Giants!
WassilyDali
Related question: what if there is no such piece available? For instance, promoting to a third knight? Can you use any captured piece to represent the desired promoted piece?
No, only a knight can be used. If there's no knight captured, the clock can be paused and the players can call the arbiter or simply borrow an already captured knight from a nearby board.
goldendog
From an old thread (re USCF rules):
"There is also mentioned the oft-used provisional upside-down rook (for a queen) as acceptable but I suppose it could stand in for a knight or bishop as well. I suppose once the piece is declared in those circumstances with the upside-down rook that any verbal designation would be final."
Upside-down rook is OK for a 2nd Queen.
It would be fun to see a composition with the pawn promoted to a pawn as the only way to win/draw (this used to be legal I think)
cofail
If there are say 10 seconds left can a player say queen and leave it as a pawn, representing a queen?
Well, when I was in a local tourney, our arbiter said that no upside-down-rooks can be used, because there's no such a piece in chess: it can be a source of controversy or cheating because the player can say for example c8=N and a few moves later move the upside-down-rook as a queen, and the arbiter can do nothing about it, because it can be used as a knight and a queen as well.
Still better to stop your clock and avoid misunderstandings
Re USCF rules:
"The rules also say to contact the td if no appropriate piece is immediately available. I don't see anything about verbally designating a piece for the promoted pawn, in fact they say that if the pawn is left on the square with no replacement the opponent merely starts the clock of the promoting player."
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by Jacob30 a few minutes ago
When is the new Vote Chess game Opening Experts vs Endgame Experts starting??
by Aditya_Deshpande8 13 minutes ago
MAJOR MALFUNTION WITH LAST GAME!!!
by htdavidht 14 minutes ago
Asking people to resign
by chrisr2212 19 minutes ago
Fritz 12 and no internet
by gutartas 20 minutes ago
Use of a copmuter for advice!
by alexlaw 27 minutes ago
Reading messages from banned members
by MindWalk 29 minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by alexlaw 45 minutes ago
Chess on Kindle
by AlexNic 46 minutes ago
What is the best ereader for pdf chess books?
by AlexNic 49 minutes ago