Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Tryin' to reach a rating under 1000


  • 3 months ago · Quote · #21

    MagnusDrewKasparov

    f*ck you ! you're stupid ! when you go below 1000 you won't be under rated you become retarded !

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #22

    eddysallin

    Joeschmo,      1100 is hard, lets see u at 1400 and then 1700.Apply your self toward a goal.....having fun has it's place.Making light of chess reflects on all  chess.com members where getting better at chess is the name of the game. At 3o u need direction not aborting games (which is  against chess policy)for fun...... time to grow up.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #23

    N2UHC

    I think it'd be very easy to get a rating below 1000.  Either keep resigning games or keep exchanging major and minor pieces for pawns.  Or play the Bongcloud.  Or set up a fool's mate.

    But why anyone would want to do that I have no idea, unless they think their current level is just too hard and they want to sandbag so they can play easier opponents.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #24

    TetsuoShima

    bobbyDK wrote:
    Ian_Sinclair wrote:

    Our competitive nature also has allowed us to advance in many areas of science and other activities. There is a balance.

    it does seem strange to me you would actually try and lose games. Losing is easy. Its winning consistently that proves more challenging. All the best with getting your rating back to par again.

    lol I wonder how a game would turn out if two players both tried to lose. I guess it would be a long and strange game where nobody wanted to win.

    it probably would end in three move repitition


Back to Top

Post your reply: