11068 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If you were playing a game of chess against an opponent aruond the same number of points than you. No pieces remained, but whatever peice(s) you chose, your opponent wuold get the other(s), what would you rather have: two rooks or a queen?
Two rooks will pwn a queen on an open board... King position will be important but as long as the side with the queen doesn't pick off a rook with a fork on the first move or have some kind of smothered mate the two rooks will own the queen
In fact... It is very difficult to win an endgame with K+Q against K+R... The side with the rooks is the only one with winning chances.
I think you're right... but if the queen did fork the rook and king in the first few moves, R and K would lose. I would want a knight if i could tho...
I would choose 2 rooks. But with no pieces remaining on the board only K+Q and K+2R I think the position is drawish and the king position is important too
2 rooks, 2 cream and 4 sugars, please. Thanks.
Two connected rooks.
2 rooks might be better as a queen is worth 9, whereas a rook is worth 5. So 2 rooks are worth 10.
The queen = 9 is a common rule but doesn't actually work that well in many cases. In a typical middlegame situation with all else equal, a queen is generally every bit as good as two rooks, though the value of the rooks increases as the endgame approaches. Though in the OP's case with nothing else on the board, that's just a draw.
I would chosse 2 rooks
2 rooks and a robin to cheer them on
With any pieces... it depends on what will give you the winning position. 2 rooks played right can be very powerful and can fight off the queen, but the queen has a movement advantage and can capture the rooks if they're unprotected with well placed king checks.
do you mean with pawns on the board? without pawns on the board it should be a dead draw in most positions. With pawns I would favor the queen as it has better mobility, and while the rooks are great at cleaning out a file, it may be difficult to reposition them to a different rank or file without getting captured. I think there was a lecture where someone claimed that the initial position with q vs 2 rooks and 8 pawns is usually a win for the queen.
There are actually quite different systems regarding the relative value of pieces around. Look here:
Btw I myself use Kaufman's values in my games (but try to heed the positional exceptions too, of course).
Like has been mentioned, the choice entirely depends on the position. A closed game will give the queen's diagonal usage more power than the rooks, whereas an open pawn endgame will give the rooks more power. I've had people intentionally trade the queen for two rooks when the position did not call for it because they thought "rooks = 10 to queen = 9". You can't quantify their value that way without taking into account the position on the board.
Using points to evaluate a position is useless. This point system is, at best, a general rule of thumb for beginners. If you are playing by looking at the points, instead of the board, it probably doesn't matter which side of this you favor.
I played black in this one (I lost on time, but had the game). 30 minute game.
I know.... I made a lot of blunders on this one... but this is a good example of how 2 rooks can over power a queen and win back the game.
5/30/2015 - Full Out Assault
by Waichai a few minutes ago
Moving two pawns in the opening
by jurassicmark a few minutes ago
Mate in 6. Masters only! :D
by lordkevinus a few minutes ago
i feel bad for both UK and America chess
by badger_song 2 minutes ago
11/24/2007 - Magnificent Mate in 7
by Ne2willdo 3 minutes ago
by SharonCarter 3 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by power_2_the_people 7 minutes ago
5/29/2015 - Kramnik-Anand WC match 2008
by RapidRainbowDash 8 minutes ago
The only reason Fischer became world champ
by power_2_the_people 13 minutes ago
Are tactics really the way to go?
by MSC157 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!