19874 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
When you use the same openings, and rarely deviate from them, you get very familiar with the positions that arise from them... but I have a theory that that leaves you vulnerable to other kinds of positions! I'm guilty of choosing solid openings and sticking with them, and I'd like to find other people who are willing to play some games against me... under the condition that both of us seek to play openings as uncomfortable to us as possible (but not deliberately losing, of course.)
Any ratings are welcome (I like playing just about anyone!) and while I do prefer Live chess 5 | 0, I'm willing to try Online as well! Unrated or rated is also fine, and we can discuss which openings we want to try. Sound fun?
You might be wondering why I'm not just doing this idea in Live Blitz automatically... my answer is that I like doing this kind of thing against people who I regularly play with, and not just a randomly selected person out of 14,000 people online!
Problem with that is you wont get the same variety of openings, moves, theories etc.. But if you dont care about improving your overall game, and just want to practice quite limited and fixed positions then I wish you luck.
I actually disagree that I wouldn't get the same variety of openings in this experiment. There's plenty of openings that I'm not familiar with that aren't "limited and fixed."
1.Nc3 and 1.b3 are great underrated openings. The mainline 1.Nc3 has a variation where black has space and a pawn wedge, but creates so many weaknesses handing white a development advantage:
Indeed! 1. e4 g5 is playable too, I've heard.
For me this is a strange subject in every respect, and I join peranto, post 2, you think you can practise quite limited fixed openings, but after a few moves you are out of your own wish-list, as the opponent does not know your ideas ( and that is good ).
I copy and confirm your first line : yes, I use the same openings and rarely ( almost never ) deviate from them, and I get very familiar with the positions that arise from them.
So : improve your overall game ( see post 2 ) and I wish you luck !
So does my opponent in many cases, because he played half of these moves.
But : that does NOT leave me vulnerable, to the contrary, it gives me splendid middle games in which I can follow the lines of the opening through the game towards the endgame.
So why not continue what you are doing : 1) I doubt you find such willing opponents, and 2) you say it yourself : " I agree that I would get the same variety of openings "
How can someone play " an uncomfortable opening " ? His repertoire has themes that probably deviate from what you should want him to play, and I think the two repertoires will not match as you should wish.
About "regular" opponents : we had one for years in a chess club, who also wanted to practise certain lines, he would discuss moves and take back as we together found a better one, and guess : all games played with such discussions ended in a draw...
Well, maybe that is why we differ in rating..
The reason playing many openings is generally a good thing, is that you will become exposed to a larger variety of strategical and tactical ideas and patterns.. You might think theres still an infinite amount of moves after 1e4 e5 but you are already limiting yourself very much in the type of games you can get. By playing such moves as 1. g3, 1.b3, 1.f4 or 1.c4 you get completely different setups and ideas.
Right on! With 1.f4 (the worst among the standards, but still quite playable, especially the Bird Wing Gambit, though 1...c5 is rare against the Bird) 1...g6 2.h4? grossly weakens the kingside, but 1.Nc3,g6 2.h4! immediately puts to question black's premature fianchetto. Position may be equal, perhaps unclear after 2.h4, but it should lead to interesting play. If black tries getting smart with double fianchettos then:
Is the use of "unusual" openings more common in Blitz and Bullet? I might see the advantage there if you have practise with the unusual opening where your opponent does not. Perhaps also a bit in longer live games, but little to no advantage in CC games?
I don't know, man. It seems 95% of the time I'm either facing 1.e4 or 1.d4 in Live Chess... which is partly what led to this forum post.
"The BIG Show with IM Danny Rensch!"
why has MSC that many profile views?
by Trapper4 2 minutes ago
Most Underrated Chess Player of All Time
by batgirl 4 minutes ago
3/5/2015 - E.Stoddard vs S.Sorenson, corr., 1977
by ReyRambler1960 4 minutes ago
Untitled player crushes ex-2700 and then draws by repetition
by pfren 5 minutes ago
Como reportar un Abuso de un jugador
by Jaketxelo 5 minutes ago
by unterseegoat 13 minutes ago
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 16 minutes ago
what tactic book help u get over that hump
by Litwitlou 25 minutes ago
by gregorypiere 27 minutes ago
Help about strategic decision
by wrathss 35 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!