I just thought of a great idea: a Conditional Vote Chess Vote! for example, im playing with chess.com against GM julio beccerra. We're still in the opening and main lines. Instead of taking so long, why dont we speed up the process by having conditional votes?? ex., if he moves e5, then u vote d6,if u voted then 3 more options will come up saying, if N3, then?....and you vote which move would be the best!
Whatada think?
i think people should POST what they think, thats what i think
I just thought of a great idea: a Conditional Vote Chess Vote! for example, im playing with chess.com against GM julio becceTra. We're still in the opening and main lines. Instead of taking so long, why dont we speed up the process by having conditional votes?? ex., if he moves e5, then u vote d6,if u voted then 3 more options will come up saying, if N3, then?....and you vote which move would be the best!
That wouldn't work. There are on average 30 legal moves in each situation, so people would have to submit a vote for every one of those legal moves, which is ridiculous, especially considering most of those legal moves are just blunders.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.