14451 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I am roughly a 950 rated player right now. My tactics trainer rating right now is 1400. I find that in almost all of my games I always acquire some sort of material advantage pretty easily in the openings and middle-game, usually a couple of pawns or a minor piece or maybe more. However, once we get to the end of the middle-game and into the endgame, I find I begin to deteriorate in my play. I often end up in a considerable positional weakness, and sometimes I even lose despite my matierial advantage.
This has happened for the past dozen or so games (both on chess.com and real). It is so frustrating to see what seems like a relatively won position degenerate into a loss, and I frankly don't see why.
Can anybody help me here? How can I improve my endgame and help convert advantages into wins?
I have bought Silmans Endgame Course (I am to read only the first couple of chapters, according to my higher rated friend) and his other book, Amateurs Mind. Will reading these books lead to me acquiring a significant improvement in my endgame?
For your level, tactics are far more important than most endgames except for the very basics. I'd recommend reading Jesus de la Villa's 100 Endgames You Must Know as a crash course in the most important things in the endgame that covers a lot of key points. I don't like Silman's endgame course as it's a bit simplistic and only covers broad points while claiming to offer something valuable. That's the difference between Silman's endgame course and de la Villa's 100 endgames - they both offer similar things, but de la Villa's doesn't pretend to be anything more than a crash course for players who don't want to put serious study into the endgame while Silman's claims to be a comprehensive manual when it really isn't. Fundamental Chess Endings by Muller is good as well for the basics. Another excellent book is Van Perlo's Endgame Tactics, which emphasizes almost all of the most common tactical tricks and finesses used in the endgame.
Best Chess.com members.
by Pulpofeira a few minutes ago
do the devil play chess?
by batgirl a few minutes ago
I BEAT A TITLED PLAYER!!!! A WFM
by GrandChampion2 15 minutes ago
7/7/2015 - Execution Of The Attack
by ReyRambler1960 16 minutes ago
Can you really become a class A player by studying tactics?
by SmyslovFan 19 minutes ago
A position from my 4th round game at the World Open
by HorsesGalore 19 minutes ago
by notmtwain 23 minutes ago
How come he wins my game?
by Lagomorph 37 minutes ago
INFP Chess Players
by andrewjeselson2 42 minutes ago
What do we do now that we are out of good FORUM TOPICS.
by ProfessorProfesesen 43 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!