13366 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
low enough to spend so much time on chess
Because IQ isn't that important to success in chess, I think IQ wouldn't be very restrictive. Probably above 70 or 80 to be a GM, but even then maybe you could find exceptions.
IQ does not include forms of intelligences such as linguistic intelligence, musical intelligence, spacial inteligence, etc. Also, people from different cultures are at a disadvantage.
I'll get a link for you sometime.
And I'm not saying this because I'm below average or something; I'm actually above average in my age group.
i did not claim it a panacea only that is it a VERY reliable source on a persons capacity to learnand it is see it is easier to learn to play violin when one is more intelligent and there are even such things as artistic prodigies (as it is not just confined to math and science)
Certainly there is some degree of correlation, I agree with that. I'm simply saying that I would not use an IQ result to judge another person's capabilities, unless we're talking about a 30 or more difference in percentile.
Another part of the issue is that intelligence doesn't have a real set definition. There's the dictionary definition, but it doesn't really encompass what most people percieve as intelligence.
I'm off to bed now, but I'll talk more about this with you soon.
I'd say that since your rating is 962 that you should start practicing more :P
looks like i have
I meant in order to achieve the title of grandmaster. You got me there.
Technically there is no IQ restriction so theoretically nothing is stopping a retard from obtaining the title. Practically however you have to be at least gifted probably since obviously a retard or even an average wouldn't have the practical mental tools to obtain such a skill level.
This talk about IQ is always a little strange to me because IQ is not constant at all. I think there is quite a bit of elitism in the thinking that our brains are just a result of genes and not also the environment. It's much cooler to say that I was born with X or as X than to say that I worked my ass of to be X.
Help! No matter what I do I get Out-Theoried
by Robert0905 5 minutes ago
New chess variant. Looking for players to play with.
by tubebender 8 minutes ago
Can Karpov become world champion again?
by Pastuszek 9 minutes ago
11/30/2015 - The Art of Breaking Through
by Random_Number 9 minutes ago
Starting Out v. Move by Move
by ylblai2 10 minutes ago
State of Chess.com Show! Post your questions here
by btickler 12 minutes ago
by jambyvedar 13 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Elubas 14 minutes ago
How to become a staff member
by etc2000chess 21 minutes ago
2001-3000 Worst Things To Do While Playing Chess
by twighead 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!