Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

What is the most SURPRISING incident happen with you while playing OTB tourney?


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #121

    ClavierCavalier

    What about when there are a few people tied for each position?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #123

    SmyslovFan

    USCF rated. The USCF handbook has clear guidelines for how prizes are to be distributed. I don't think it's actually against the rules to have equal shares for 3rd through 6th, but it isn't recommended.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #124

    varelse1

    when I was on my H.S. team, we travelled to another school to play them. Our opponents board 4 player had the previous week been kicked off the team for fighting. He was replaced by his younger brother.

    So we get there, start the clocks, push some pawns. About 15 minutes into it, the big brother walks in the door and sez "Dad said you can come home now, or stay here forever!" So the younger brother shrugged, tipped his king, signed the score sheet, and left.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #125

    UltraLaser

    piphilologist wrote:
    Abhishek2 wrote:

    Eventually I won my last round and finished with 5/6. I earned almost $400. I was a  then!

    Dollars? it says you're in england?

    I guess that's enough proof that he doesn't come from england - first a recent "thanksgiving tournament", now dollars :P

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #126

    solskytz

    Piphilologist your post about the blunder from p. 3 of this thread is hilarious!

    This once happened to me as black... I went into the ...Nxe4 trick, immediately realizing that I'm dropping my Bc5 into the bargain. Awful! And to an opponent rated like 1660 when I was rated around 1740, Israeli rating...

    it was tough, but ironically I knew I shouldn't be losing to this player! So I played on, started to run kind of wild, sacrificed another minor piece for inadequate reasons or compensation... and did win the game :-)

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #127

    Abhishek2

    piphilologist wrote:
    Abhishek2 wrote:

    Eventually I won my last round and finished with 5/6. I earned almost $400. I was a  then!

    Dollars? it says you're in england?

    lol note that my country is fake.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #128

    Abhishek2

    UltraLaser wrote:
    piphilologist wrote:
    Abhishek2 wrote:

    Eventually I won my last round and finished with 5/6. I earned almost $400. I was a  then!

    Dollars? it says you're in england?

    I guess that's enough proof that he doesn't come from england - first a recent "thanksgiving tournament", now dollars :P

    lol.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #129

    9thEagle

    So, I play most of my tournaments locally, which means I play more-or-less the same people every time. Since I usually play in the highest section, I pretty much know everyone better than me, down to about 100 pts below me. There was this one tournament were I was doing horribly (final score was 1/2 out of 4, and the draw was very sketchy--I had 3 pawns vs my opponent's 1 pawn and bishop--but my opponent was nervous and didn't want to risk it, and I had 24 and 1/2 points out of the 25 I needed to letter, and it was the last tournament of the year).

    I lost to someone rated 200 points below me in the first round, and then drew against someone rated 250 points below me (I blame the uncomfortable chairs). After the second round, I was stewing in the skittles room and eating lunch. This guy I had never seen before asked me if I wanted to play a game. Since I'd never seen him before, I thought he was rated around 800 (he was a Caucasian high-schooler. What else would he be rated?), so I played without really giving it a lot of thought.

    I used the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit (usually I play the Veresov, but I like the BDG for a quick win against weaker players--if worse comes to worse and my tactical fireworks fizzle, I feel confident that they will lose the endgame regardless of being up a few pawns). So 1.d4 d5 2. e4?! and my opponent looks at the "free" pawn, and then takes it without much contemplation of what could be wrong with it. Even most 1000 rated players would check to see if it was a trap (they would probably decide that it wasn't and take the pawn anyway), but this guy just took it without regard of the consequences.

    We played on through the Von Popiel variation, and he surprised me by making a lot of strong book moves (in the BDG, anything not "book" is immediately losing). Then I attacked his queen with another "free" pawn; after he took it (he wasn't supposed to), I nonchalantly played a 4-move tactic while eating my pizza with the other hand. Another day of outwitting those silly beginners. At least I'd get one win that day, even if it wasn't very hard-earned.

    After we shook, the guy gave me this wierd look and asked me what my rating is. "Meh . . . somewhere around 1400," I replied, exaggerating slightly to impress him. "What are you rated?" I asked, trying to figure out how complicated my advice to him should be.

    "1900," He said with a rueful smile.

    Apparently he had just come here from Argentina, which is why I had never seen him before. He was playing in a round robin section (there were only about 4 people rated over 1700), which he later won despite forfeiting the first round because he was late.

     

     But that wasn't the MOST suprising thing to happen to me in a tournament. See post #60 for that.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #130

    Abhishek2

    You and your pizza chess.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #131

    JacksofClubs

    when this sinica cee pulled a lamaichai and didn't cole me on the panny sty.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #132

    piphilologist

    9thEagle wrote:

    So, I play most of my tournaments locally, which means I play more-or-less the same people every time. Since I usually play in the highest section, I pretty much know everyone better than me, down to about 100 pts below me. There was this one tournament were I was doing horribly (final score was 1/2 out of 4, and the draw was very sketchy--I had 3 pawns vs my opponent's 1 pawn and bishop--but my opponent was nervous and didn't want to risk it, and I had 24 and 1/2 points out of the 25 I needed to letter, and it was the last tournament of the year).

    I lost to someone rated 200 points below me in the first round, and then drew against someone rated 250 points below me (I blame the uncomfortable chairs). After the second round, I was stewing in the skittles room and eating lunch. This guy I had never seen before asked me if I wanted to play a game. Since I'd never seen him before, I thought he was rated around 800 (he was a Caucasian high-schooler. What else would he be rated?), so I played without really giving it a lot of thought.

    I used the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit (usually I play the Veresov, but I like the BDG for a quick win against weaker players--if worse comes to worse and my tactical fireworks fizzle, I feel confident that they will lose the endgame regardless of being up a few pawns). So 1.d4 d5 2. e4?! and my opponent looks at the "free" pawn, and then takes it without much contemplation of what could be wrong with it. Even most 1000 rated players would check to see if it was a trap (they would probably decide that it wasn't and take the pawn anyway), but this guy just took it without regard of the consequences.

    We played on through the Von Popiel variation, and he surprised me by making a lot of strong book moves (in the BDG, anything not "book" is immediately losing). Then I attacked his queen with another "free" pawn; after he took it (he wasn't supposed to), I nonchalantly played a 4-move tactic while eating my pizza with the other hand. Another day of outwitting those silly beginners. At least I'd get one win that day, even if it wasn't very hard-earned.

    After we shook, the guy gave me this wierd look and asked me what my rating is. "Meh . . . somewhere around 1400," I replied, exaggerating slightly to impress him. "What are you rated?" I asked, trying to figure out how complicated my advice to him should be.

    "1900," He said with a rueful smile.

    Apparently he had just come here from Argentina, which is why I had never seen him before. He was playing in a round robin section (there were only about 4 people rated over 1700), which he later won despite forfeiting the first round because he was late.

     

     But that wasn't the MOST suprising thing to happen to me in a tournament. See post #60 for that.

    I can imagine the same thing happening to me, and I'm over 2000 fide lol

    you sound like one of these players who know a lot of opening theory, then don't play as well for the rest of the game... when I was 1400 I knew no opening theory at all beyond parhaps move 2 or 3 and even now my openings are weak which becomes a serious problem at this level. 

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #133

    solskytz

    Scary! To fall for opening prep by an 1400... but then at least you learn something. 

    Also, as you rise up the ratings, how frequently do you even get to play 1400s?

    And nothing is wrong with giving them a good feeling from time to time...

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #134

    solskytz

    Piphilologist There at your last couple of lines it could have been Carlsen speaking..

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #135

    9thEagle

    you sound like one of these players who know a lot of opening theory, then don't play as well for the rest of the game... 

    Actually, I'm just really good at tactics (comparatively speaking). The BDG gives me lots of those. I don't really know a lot of openings by the book (I've never looked at a single line of the Sicillian, despite it being my sole response to e4), except for the BDG. (That's because I loved how sharp it is, so I would test my tactics by spend in a few minutes each day in a line, trying to figure out the best move, and then checking with the database.) Mostly, the reason why I'm 1400 is because I blunder too much and can't play positionally. In a sharp game, some IM's thought I was closer to 1800. Because I am less likely to blunder against a higher rated opponent, I actually have a better win rato against higher rated opponents than lower rated ones.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #136

    Samsch

    9thEagle wrote:

    you sound like one of these players who know a lot of opening theory, then don't play as well for the rest of the game... 

    Actually, I'm just really good at tactics (comparatively speaking). The BDG gives me lots of those. I don't really know a lot of openings by the book (I've never looked at a single line of the Sicillian, despite it being my sole response to e4), except for the BDG. (That's because I loved how sharp it is, so I would test my tactics by spend in a few minutes each day in a line, trying to figure out the best move, and then checking with the database.) Mostly, the reason why I'm 1400 is because I blunder too much and can't play positionally. In a sharp game, some IM's thought I was closer to 1800. Because I am less likely to blunder against a higher rated opponent, I actually have a better win rato against higher rated opponents than lower rated ones.

    Cool :)

    But if you play the Sicilian, you should at least know one line...

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #137

    9thEagle

    I probably should, but I've played enough games with the Sicillian to be able to beat people around my rating in OTB, because no one else knows the lines either (about 1400 rating, but I've only been playing for about a year, so I haven't peaked out). Right before I played my first tournament game, a 1200 player showed me the structure of the Sicillian dragon--ever since, I've just kinda aimed for the structure and played chess. I have something like a 90% win rate with it, but I suspect that will drop when I finally get to people that actually know the lines. I don't have a lot of time to learn lines, so I've been trying to find a less theory-intensive opening that would be similar to the Sicillian, but I won't lose just because I've been outstudied. No luck yet.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #138

    kingforce

    this guy I was playing I'm sure was not looking at the board, the whole time, it was quite bizarre, any suggestions? I mean the occasional glance but nothing more than that,

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #139

    blake78613

     I played against Bobby Fischer in a simul at Lawrence, Kansas in 1962.  Fischer won all of his games except one which he drew against the late Jack Winters.  I didn't know Jack at the time but got to know him very well years later (he was my bridge partner).

     Jack told me the story about his game with Fischer.  He had played a counter gambit against Fischer's Evans Gambit.  Jack reached a position where he could force a perpetual check.  Jack's wife at the time was a strong player and was also playing in the simul.  She asked Jack what he was going to play on the next move.  Jack stated that he was going to play for a win.  His wife told him,  "Up to now Fischer had not been paying that much attention to your game, but there only about 8 other players left in the simul and they all have lost games. Soon you are going to be playing Fischer one on one.  Nobody is going to be interested in your story of how you allmost beat Fischer but if you draw Fischer you will have something to talk about."  Jack thought it over and decided she was right and took the draw.

    This is all prelude to my story which happen when I was playing in a Swiss weekend tournament in Kansas City.  Time controls were longer back then (no sudden death or allegro finishes).  I had played three tough long game on Saturday, and Sunday morning I felt tired.  I decided that would be happy with a quick draw.  I found I was paired with a young woman who was rated about 200 points above me.  She played in a chess club I did, but I didn't know much about her.  She arrived late, and really looked tired.  I said to myself, "Pull yourself together, no matter how tired you are she feels twice as bad."

    I am White and the game follows the same moves as my game with Fischer, and she makes the same mistake I did.  I win quickly and tell her.  "This is strange, this game follows a game I played against Fischer"

    She asked, "When did you play Fischer?"

    I respond, "Lawrence, Kansas 1962."

    She says, "I played at that Simul. I was the only woman playing.  Do you know Jack Winters, he played at that Simul?"

    I say, "Oh yea, he wanted to play for a win and his ex-wife talked him..."

    At this point I finally put two and two together, and stop in mid-sentence.   I feel extremely embarrassed and hope the ground will open up and  swallow me.  Fortunately, she laughs and is very gracious about it.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #140

    Samsch

    lololol, nice!


Back to Top

Post your reply: