15803 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Why do I have to be so stupid and promote all my pawns while his king is trapped then I make one stupid mistake and stalemate. Can someone help me so I don't make stupid endgame blunders.
Do you know anything about stalemate ? Where a King has no legal move is a stalemate=draw. That what happen in all these games here.
I know. At the end I kind of stop thinking. What can I do so I don't stalemate.
Give your enemy king some space so that it can move around until you give the check that make the checkmate.
just pay attention..
You need to check for stalemates, see if he has any legal moves in order to avoid it.
on the 64th move ...Qe3 driving to king toward the corner (a8)
It's easy to get relaxed and make simple oversights in winning positions - or perhaps you get too eager to finish off your opponent and forget to look for the pitfalls. What really stinks is that your opponents are getting rewarded for their dumb perseverance. The next time you play someone who refuses to quit, just take an extra minute to look before you make your move. In fact, you should wait as long as time allows even you've already decided on your move. If they want to drag things out, so can you.
It's easy to get relaxed and make simple oversights in winning positions - or perhaps you get too eager to finish off your opponent and forget to look for the pitfalls. Agree with that statement What really stinks is that your opponents are getting rewarded for their dumb perseverance. The next time you play someone who refuses to quit, just take an extra minute to look before you make your move. Yes In fact, "you should wait as long as time allows even you've already decided on your move. If they want to drag things out, so can you." Disagreed with that one is "unsportman like" is consider to be rude but not breaking the rule. The best thing to do is to finish off the game with a checkmate in the quickest possible way.
If you check him, it can't be stalemate.
I'm guessing he just doesn't know the basic mating patterns.
that is true is only when the opponent turn to move and if no other pieces (usually pawns) can't make a move nor the king can make a legal move is stalemate.
yes, your problem is easily fixed. Play the mate in one when it's there.
In your first diagram you have the enemy king trapped along your first rank and either of your queens can zoom down to the first rank and deliver mate but then you try and promote a pawn? Why?
Finding a stock of mate-in-one puzzles might help you a lot. You don't need three queens on the board.
You should learn some basic mating patterns so that you know what you're trying to do when you get a material advantage. Try Bobby Fischer teaches chess or use the tactics trainer here.
You play well enough during the other parts of the game -- it seems like someone taught you to take away free squares around the enemy king and then checkmate it. This is good advice which helps beginners not aimlessly check a king around -- but if you follow it too far and take away every square when no other pieces are around it's stalemate.
Like Padman said if you became familiar with some mating patterns it would help you out a lot -- the following puzzles are positions from the games you shared. 1, 2, and 3 are mates in one. The 4th puzzle is from the same game as the 3rd but is a bit harder, it's a mate in 2. Two different moves lead to mate in 2, but it only lets me have one correct answer.
haha I had the same incident once as the first one you showed, except I had 4 queens when I stalemated the poor guy. :P
Mr amandeep1 this is a nice game you had is was good. Stick with the turn based for a little while.
That's one of those questions that is best not asked of others but asked of yourself after taking a good hard look at the scary insides of your head.
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by UltraLaser a few minutes ago
Is it agaisnt the rules so delay games?
by Billion_Tactics_Boy a few minutes ago
Is this end position winning?
by AndyClifton a few minutes ago
Is this unreasonable?
by I-eat-guini-pigs a few minutes ago
12/7/2013 - 1001 Brilliant ways to Checkmate by Reinfeld, #404
by Karl_Kreidbaum a few minutes ago
Tracking albeit censored
by I-eat-guini-pigs 3 minutes ago
If You were Doing Life Which 5 Books Would You Keep To Make Your game Strong?
by JCPRio 4 minutes ago
Carlsen: The Best of All Time
by ponz111 6 minutes ago
The Scheveningen Sicilian
by FromMuToYou 6 minutes ago
by red-lady 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!