8999 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
True_Beginner
Hi guys, this is my another beginner's question about chess.What the "++" mark means?Soma say it means checkmate, some say it means double-check (which isn't always a checkmate)So, which one?Thanks, in advance.
DrSpudnik
if "+" is check, "++" looks like double check, especially since "#" is checkmate.
Is there a double check in the position?
ivandh
I have seen ++ used to mean checkmate. In either usage it is not standard...
sluck72
++ used to be check mate. You don't see it that often anymore since most use #. I laughed at ++ being double check.
SonofPearl
Wikipedia says:
A move which places the opponent's king in check usually has the notation "+" appended. Or sometimes a dagger is used: "†". Or the abbreviation: ch. Double check is commonly notated the same as check, but is sometimes represented specially as dbl ch, or in older books as "++". The Encyclopedia of Chess Openings omits any indication of check.
Checkmate at the completion of moves can be notated as "#" (some use "++" instead, but the USCF recommends "#"). Or the word mate is commonly used. Occasionally the double dagger is seen: "‡".
whirlwind2011
@OP: ivandh is correct, as to the symbol's usage. Most publications these days, as far as I've seen, use ++ to mean double check. This is a meaningless distinction, though, and monographs only use it trivially, merely to enlighten the reader to the fact that a double check has arisen in the position. Beyond this, double check does not matter: a check is a check, regardless of whether it's "double." That is why Chess.com does not use ++ in the move lists whenever a double check occurs.
As far as I can remember, ++ also used to mean checkmate, which also was already stated above. Indeed, this was how I was originally taught to write a checkmating move.
goldendog
In MCO-10, + meant a distinct superiority and ++ meant a winning advantage.
I haven't seen that usage in a long time.
nameno1had
I had a wierd thought about double check... I have never seen that in notation...
# this is checkmate....i am gonna guess double check for the ++
double plus ungood
-waller-
I have always used ++ for double check, and # for checkmate. It's fairly good notation I think.
wishiwonthatone
which, like all double negatives, means really really good.
Orwell wasn't too specific, so we need to take the meaning out of the context.
++
Warbler
according to page 218 of the US Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess 5th Edition http://www.uscfsales.com/product_p/b0012rh.htm
the "++" means checkmate.
What do they say the notation is for double check?
Nah, those were what I mean.
So?
bastiaan
++ is checkmate, + is check or double check
the book doesn't give a notation for double check.
huh?
um, there was discussion going as to whether "++" meant double check or checkmate. I just thought I'd see what the official rule book for the USCF says about it and post that." btw, the USCF is the governing body of chess in American and they are affiliated with FIDE, the governing body of chess around the world.
backyard professor
by sushi362 a few minutes ago
Mate in 3
by Andrew12129 a few minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Ubik42 3 minutes ago
Best Tactic Books
by kkbell420 3 minutes ago
Door #1, Door #2, or Door #3?
by flapup 4 minutes ago
Do premium members get a free ride?
by Ubik42 6 minutes ago
I beat myself at chess every single time.
by FancyKnight 7 minutes ago
Chess.com implementing the "like/dislike button"?
by BorgQueen 8 minutes ago
Killer Blow
by Moremover 10 minutes ago
Who is winning in this endgame?
by Mach491 10 minutes ago