Enjoying chess I would say for the 10th question :)
What Would YOU Rather Have?
Sort:
1. Depends on all the other pieces.
2. Depends on all the other pieces.
3. 8 pawns, but still will depend.
4. Depends on all the other pieces.
5. Depends on all the other pieces.
6. ?
7. Depends.
8. Both first names are interesting, not sure.
9. Kasparov
10. As a preferential question, this is poorly phrased. People by definition prefer enjoyment to non-enjoyment.
1. 2 Rooks
2. 2 Bishops and a Knight
3. 8 Pawns
4. Rook+Bishop+2 Pawns
5. 4 Pawns
6. Rating
7. Live Chess
8. Caruana
9. Kasparov
10. Strange Question. If I wouldn't enjoy it already I woulnd't play. I'm okay with not winning as long as it's not caused by blunders.
1. Queen
2. Queen
3. 8 pawns
4. Queen and one pawn
5. 4 pawns
6. the rating of1450-1850
7. 8/14 in online chess tournament.
8. Neither.
9. Kasparov
10. Enjoying the game of chess.
SupremeOverlord wrote:
makhnoukh wrote:
6. 9 queens in a game or a rating of (1450-1850)
9 queens just means I don't know how to checkmate properly, and that rating range is beneath me. Taking either options will make me a worse player than I currently am, so this is a tough question.
Your rating is 1472
1. 2 rooks
2. 2 bishops and 1 knight
3. 8 pawns
4. Rook, bishop and 2 pawns
5. 4 pawns
6. 9 queens
7. 7/7
8. Kramnik
9. Kasparov
10. Enjoying chess
SupremeOverlord wrote:
DefinitelyNotGM wrote:
SupremeOverlord wrote:
makhnoukh wrote:
6. 9 queens in a game or a rating of (1450-1850)
9 queens just means I don't know how to checkmate properly, and that rating range is beneath me. Taking either options will make me a worse player than I currently am, so this is a tough question.
Your rating is 1472
That's just on chess.com
IRL I'm 2037
I don't know how strong you are, but on chess.com you have not played enough standard games to have an accurate rating. Since Blitz and bullet are not accurate enought, i would say that he easily could be much better though i have no idea if he is
1 two rooks
2 depending on the position of the minor pieces or the position of the pawns, but if all were sound three minor pieces
3 8 pawns
4 rook bishop 2 pawns
5 i'll take the pawns in the endgame, the knight in the middle
6 i don't get the point of this one
7 skip
8 Kramnik
9 Definatly Kasparov, deep blue may have beaten Kasparov, but still i would play Kasparov
10 to win, although i would rather play a strong player and get crushed, than to play a weak player and crush him!
on almost all the answers it does, but i would say in general 8 pawns is better than one rook depends a lot on position though
1-7. Depends
8. Kramnik
9. Kasparov
10. Both!
dumb question