Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

What's is Magnus Carlsen's IQ?


  • 9 months ago · Quote · #381

    Likhit1

    nameno1had wrote:
    Likhit1 wrote:
    indurain wrote:

    Education and intelligence 

    Unfortunately a lot of people assume that a given level of education is an indicator of intelligence. In my experience it is anything but.

    When I was at school, the teacher used the word "dunce" to describe one boy in our class. Clearly this chap had even less interest in the books than the rest of us. But I remember the teacher giving him a hard time.

    Outside of school this same boy was always tinkering with car engines. His interest in cars far outweighed any academic ambitions.

    Some years after we left school, those of us who had gone on to university etc could not have missed the newspaper reports showing that same boy being paid £1 million pounds in 1971 by Rolls Royce for the patent which he developed for an engine modification. The same teachers who called this boy a dunce, could only dream of that kind of money.

    Point is that intelligence has many different markers.

    +1.Completely agree with you.Even Thomas Alva Edison and Albert Einstein's teachers called them a dunce.

    Edison referred to Tesla as beneath him, wouldn't listen to him or pay him for his work and each in their own way were definitely geniuses, if you ask me. I'd say Tesla was the more brilliant of the two but, I have given more merit, in later years, to Edison's work. I think perhaps had Tesla lived long enough, he would have also. I think the same could be said of Edison.

    In fact, I asked myself the other day, what would the world have been like, if they'd have respected each other, taken the time to realize the relevance of their respective works and been willing to work together where applicable and be there for one another otherwise ?

    True.Tesla is extremely underrated tbh.Few people know of his extraordinary brilliance with machines.

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #382

    Sickwithstrategy

    I think its safe to say the highest rated chess player in history is going to be a genius.. Therefore IQ and chess ability interlink

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #383

    fburton

    Sickwithstrategy wrote:

    I think its safe to say the highest rated chess player in history is going to be a genius.. Therefore IQ and chess ability interlink

    A genius at chess for sure. I'm not yet convinced (because I haven't seen the evidence) that chess ability and IQ are particularly strongly correlated.

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #384

    btickler

    Sickwithstrategy wrote:

    I think its safe to say the highest rated chess player in history is going to be a genius.. Therefore IQ and chess ability interlink

    "I think it's safe to say that licorice and ice cream sundaes taste good...therefore licorice ice cream sundaes are everyone's favorite sundae.  So say I, and there's your proof."

    Just as ridiculous a statement.

  • 8 weeks ago · Quote · #385

    Filip8128

    @Twobit: according to answers on this quora page it's not harder to learn a second language when you get older:

    http://www.quora.com/How-does-age-correlate-with-how-fast-one-can-learn-a-language

  • 8 weeks ago · Quote · #386

    TheGreatOogieBoogie

    Why wouldn't IQ correlate with chess which is supposed to be a thinking game (in particular memory recall, judgment, and calculation)?  It would be like saying powerlifting doesn't correlate with physical strength.

  • 8 weeks ago · Quote · #387

    btickler

    Filip8128 wrote:

    @Twobit: according to answers on this quora page it's not harder to learn a second language when you get older:

    http://www.quora.com/How-does-age-correlate-with-how-fast-one-can-learn-a-language

    You're responding to a 3 year old post, to a person who has no visible account activity since mid-2013 ;)...

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #388

    Ranaldo

    Magnus is amazing fullstop.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #389

    dayowl

    I'm beginning to believe that IQ has little to do with playing a good game of chess - but good spatial sense has.  This would explain why children take to chess so easily.  That, and a willingness to take risks.  Boldness and courage on the battle field...and a thorough understanding of the game.

     

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #390

    Texo

    An IQ test is about recognising logical patterns, and as chess is pretty much the same thing I think there is some correlation. I think most people can reach ~2600 with enough tutoring and such, but to come above that, like a Super GM, you need something special.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #391

    Dodger111

    i thought he was retartet

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #392

    bopgirl

    Interesting question.  I think having good spatial ability would be an enormous asset in chess.  I've just started chess and am doing well enough, but the "visualize the chess board" problems leave me stumped.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #393

    Cla_21

    Probably is higher than 170, but I will search in Google

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #394

    casual_chess_yo

    Cla_21 wrote:

    Probably is higher than 170, but I will search in Google

    uh no probably not lol

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #395

    bopgirl

    ox0xvc wrote:

    I would speculate... 130 - 150

    He's not so much "intelligent" as having a very good memory.

    He's also quite immature for a 24 year old.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #396

    bopgirl

    I read online that Kasparov's IQ is around 190. 

    For any fictions readers out there, "The Queen's Gambit" by Walter Tevis is one of my favorite books; it gives you an inside look at a great chess player's mind.  For fans of old-time movies, Tevis also wrote "The Hustler".

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #397

    Spiker439

    nameno1had wrote:

    I realize this isn't perfect science but, it is quite hard to ignore:

    This speaks for itself, you should notice an interesting correlation to the one below it:

    I chose this set of stats because it best characterizes the behavior of the tactics trainer's timer.

    I lol'd. If I put up a graph of the time it takes people to poop, it would likely have the same binomial distribution. Would you then conclude that pooping times and chess prowess were linked? Durrrrrrrr........


Back to Top

Post your reply: