9661 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Who gives a dump?
He was probably never tested. He said he did not know in an interview. But here is the interesting thing; he admitted that many times he did not calculate moves, but went by how a certain move "felt". This feeling in reality is the result of the synthesized outcome of thousands of games , subconsciously. This is similar to Koltanowski's description of his talent in blindfold chess. So it may be more interesting to now his EQ (emotional quotient).
Have you read Malcolm Gladwell's book, "Blink"?
good player has a good sense on positions.its energy flow detection.
I thinki players like Carlsen have a huge staff of Granmasters proviging him with variations, openings, player-profiles soup to nuts. Players like Carlsen are fed with newest comp-lines (Fischer also critizised that, as far as i remember). That means they dont need intelligence nor creativity. The only task they follow up is to recall lines, patterns and moves the up to date chessprograms gave them.This is professional sports, we only see the event, but not behind the scene.
Since an amateur has not such a staff behind working him, we have no chance.
Around 2826.0, just look it up on the FIDE IQ site
So, you can find it on the net:
Garry Kasparov: 190
Bobby Fischer: 167
Judith Polgar: 170
Robert Byrne: 170
But Carlsen, should we guess, would be around 180-190
Who cares about Judith Polgar? she's ranked like #50 in the world....
I do care about Judith Polgar.
# 50 in the world is pretty good if you ask me, she could easily kick our butts.
Probably not that it matters a great deal, but the figure I have heard
for Fischer's IQ is most often : 187 not 167.
He doesn't need a test, he's figuring it out on his own...
He can't be too smart. He spends all his time playing stupid board games.
On a related note, what is Usain Bolt's diet plan like?
How do you feel about players who win by cowardly queening a pawn
by lookslikeblood 4 minutes ago
7/23/2014 - Kasparov - Vilaisarn (simul) 2008
by grig1999 5 minutes ago
by dashkee94 5 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by ponz111 6 minutes ago
Poker Chess Magic The Gathering Baccarat
by NaviePokoy 12 minutes ago
Hou Yifan preparing to replace Judit Polgar as Women's #1?
by watcha 17 minutes ago
What to do when your opponent makes a move (for U1200)
by TardisBenko 19 minutes ago
Why did you choose the username you have?
by RecklessPat 29 minutes ago
You can only get smarter by playing a smarter opponent.
by claptonscream2 41 minutes ago
Ratings Are Deceiving
by kasirohan 62 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!