10681 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I play 1. e4:
- Ruy Lopez
- Open Sicilian (English & Yugoslav Attack)
- 3. Nc3 in the French
- Panov-Botwinnik vs the CK
- Grab a big center and push aggresively against the pirc/modern/owen etc.
With black I usually play a Ruy against e4 and I haven't found any opening system I really like against the other opening moves, so I mix it up.
All my opening knowledge is from using a database in correspondence chess anyways.
I need to learn some new openings
It might be prudent to question that assumption.
Agreed. Livluvrok's rating here on Chess.com is under 1300. At that level, it doesn't matter what opening you play, since your opponents won't stick to "book" moves, anyway, and your study time is best spent elsewhere.
Just stick to 1. e4 as white, and push a center pawn two squares on your first move as black (whichever center pawn won't get captured immediately), and that's all the opening repertoire you need.
If you want to study something to improve, skip the openings, study tactics, and read Chernev's "Logical Chess: Move by Move". That book teaches opening principles, along with principles for other parts of that game. That's what you need, not specific moves.
Ugh, he might become better if he plays good openings.
I am only recently studying opening theory and have done pretty well. Learn to play chess, then refine your understanding of the principles by studying old opening theory and then move into more recent.
I've heard that king or queen pawn opening (one after the other, either order) is the strongest opening. How true is this?
Umm, no. Not at that level. What's the point of learning to play a good opening if you're just going to blunder and lose in the middle game and end game? Until you reach intermediate level (maybe 1500 OTB, or 1800 on this site), you shouldn't study openings at all. Learn basic opening principles, like what's in the Chernev book I recommended, but don't worry about specific move orders.
Besides, if he's playing against opponents at his own level, then they won't follow the "book" moves anyhow, so he'll have to improvise early and often. So he won't even get a chance to use those book openings.
Its difficult to pick a favourite, but probably the trompowsky:1.d4 nf6 2.bg5 The opening itself is quite rare, though completely sound. The reason it is rare is because it is = with bet play from black, therefore it is somewhat neglected at top level.
This keeps the game firmly within your repertoire, rather than 2.c4 when you must learn all the other players systems.
I was stationed in Britain in the early 90's, and due largely to the influence of Adams, everybody was playing the Trompowski.
And by everybody, I mean the taxi driver, the bartender, the kid delivering newspapers.
I followed that crap rule and I was awful, I started studying openings and I started getting better and I'm still getting better. Any just so you know it is 1400 (Chess.com ratings) that is the cut off line for beginner and intermediate.
If you want to waste time studying openings instead of taking the advice of every single master, grandmaster, and chess coach EVER, who all agree that studying tactics will improve your game faster than anything else, then go for it.
As for your arbitrary cutoff between beginner and intermediate, I have no idea where you got that number from, but I won't argue with it. My point was that you should be a pretty strong intermediate player before you bother with openings. And even then, you should still spend at least 90% of your chess study time studying pretty much everything else in chess if you really want to improve.
Yes, I am saying not to studying openings at all. At least, not until you reach a decent intermediate strength of play by studying other areas. Learn some opening principles, and go from there. That's all you need.
@Fromper: what do you reccomend me working on the most?
Google Dan Heisman's Novice Nook column, and read his article entitled "The Four Homeworks".
I think the various responses this thread has received just further proves the point that a beginner player should not be learning multiple openings. There's dozens of openings that are playable. Its all a matter of what you like to play. Pick one and learn it really well. Don't memorize move orders. Learn the ideas behind the moves and understand why they are the best moves. Outside of that study tactics. Learning many different openings will not improve your chess. It will only confuse you while you play as soon as your opponent plays a non book move.
I like to play the Benko Gambit. The idea of going for queenside pressure is exciting and easy to set up. Lots of fun!
Play the Slav Defense (ECO A10) against the Queen's Gambit.
Have you had a chance to study Anand's new line yet?
Sicilian, Ruy Lopez, Kings Indian, Grunfeld.
I have no idea what this is.
I also like the Mora,and Gorhing gambits. ;p
Post #43 is a Nimzo-Indian. It's basically the Saemisch Variation (E24) of the Nimzo, but 7.f3 looks bad. Why didn't black play 7...Qh4+ instead of the abject retreat?
Here's a line that makes more sense against 5...Ne4. It was analysed on another site.
@livluvrok & others.
It does not matter that much what you choose. Pick some you like at first sight and study them. Play over mastergames, look at a video, read a book, ask a friend and last but not least try them in online chess. Analyze your first games with an new opening afterwards and use a database as reference. You can also anlyze your games with (free) software available.
All the best and success.
Good point.That makes a lot of sense,for anyone less than 2,000. ;p
Do you still remember your first game of chess?
by ConnorMacleod_151 a few minutes ago
3/13/2014 - Cold As Ice
by arsenchess2001 a few minutes ago
3/15/2014 - Speed Chess Tactics
by GiuseppeGallo a few minutes ago
HELP! Screen too LARGE!!
by Kasvarof 2 minutes ago
I WANT THIS TOPIC BE DELETED
by ConnorMacleod_151 2 minutes ago
Why do I play better against high-rated opponents than low-rated ones?
by Insomni4c 3 minutes ago
Wooden Chess Sets in India
by Jack_Burton 8 minutes ago
Why is the Smith-Morra Gambit so popular?
by Yaroslavl 9 minutes ago
Why do I lose a winning game because my opponent disconnects?
by Estrinian 20 minutes ago
why do u like chess.
by sluck72 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!