9905 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Definitely not Elroch
@Zborg, you are such a flirt.
Glad to see an old dog can learn new tricks, @Elroch. Merry Christmas, and Happy Holidays to you too.
@Kingpatzer has respectfully requested his thread back. Let's give it to him. I'm game.
To wit, Karpov, Kasparov, GM John Nunn, and even GM Ken Rogoff have all had (or are having) outstanding "careers," whether chess or otherwise.
Carlsen's (chess) career has yet to fully unfold, so he doesn't count, yet. Sorry, no awards for WCC "in waiting."
Can this question even be approached effectively, let alone answered?
@Kingpatzer has laid down the parameters. Have at It Folks!
Paul Keres, - not only of his actual career but also the way he got into it ... In the early 1930's there was no chess culture one could talk about in Estonia (apart from the baltic-german one). The only theoretical works that were accessible, were pre-Stenitz German chess books. I can not think of any highly rated chess players, who had to do so much work just to get into properly playing chess. (not only chess literature was scarce, but Keres didn't have many players to even play with, so his chess matured mostly by playing correspondence chess while in high school - perhaps 150 games simultaneously). Keres's success in the chess world can not be compared for instance to the Russian players, who had their own school of chess.
Have to take my top off as he is hated and for good reason.
Now i have to say Tal.
I would say Fischer
but next probably Stalin
Bishop and Knight Endgame Help
by ProfessorFacepalm 2 minutes ago
Proof Game in 20 moves
by icyviper 3 minutes ago
by Crappov 6 minutes ago
1/26/2015 - Richard Teichmann vs. NN, Berlin, 1914
by wrik16 11 minutes ago
Setting Chesstempo for Ideal Study
by Chicken_Monster 19 minutes ago
White's light sq. bishop after 1.d4 and 2.c4
by hackerdentist 27 minutes ago
Average Ratings: OMG!
by LHB58 36 minutes ago
Sacrificing knight for 2 pawns
by hackerdentist 36 minutes ago
Please give me some advise on how to analyse your games .
by Laurenchessdiva 43 minutes ago
Geraralism in chess, from general chess players.
by LazyChessPlayer3201 50 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!