Who is more physically attractive
Sort:
I think the answer is not obvious so I have to ask it.
Boooooooooooooooring Been done a hundred times. Next.
Rearrange this: lrtol
Who is more attractive? I am, of course.
free: I could have done without that pic.
free-at-last wrote:
thecentipede wrote:
Looks like she's making an illegal move with her queen.
I didnt see it, I was momentarily distracted
free-at-last wrote:
thecentipede wrote:
Looks like she's making an illegal move with her queen.
There is a chess board?
free-at-last a écrit :
thecentipede wrote:
Looks like she's making an illegal move with her queen.
May be not. Perhaps the King moved and gave the possibility for the Queen to make a journey, the King came back at his first place and then she plays the Queen again. Stupid but not impossible.
Far as she is concerned, if its a woman then it should be riding a horse, and besides, the Queen should be able to make the moves of every piece brahs.
Saw them too. Noticed the Queen after about five minutes.
ielosubmarine wrote:
Saw them too. Noticed the Queen after about five minutes.
That's understandable Subby. I mean, floating a'O in the deep blue sea must pretty hard on ur lovelife....
[COMMENT DELETED]
Superqueen500 wrote:
Stay on topic guys. I'm sure most heterosexual males on this forum are more concerned with the physical attractiveness of Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand then some random bimbo patzer.
We don't know that she's a patzer. She could be rated something like 3200.
jurassicmark wrote:
Superqueen500 wrote:
Stay on topic guys. I'm sure most heterosexual males on this forum are more concerned with the physical attractiveness of Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand then some random bimbo patzer.
We don't know that she's a patzer. She could be rated something like 3200.
Yeah, that's likely.
jurassicmark wrote:
Superqueen500 wrote:
Stay on topic guys. I'm sure most heterosexual males on this forum are more concerned with the physical attractiveness of Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand then some random bimbo patzer.
We don't know that she's a patzer. She could be rated something like 3200.
Only if she's hiding a houdini/stockfish chip inbetween her breasts.
Superqueen500 wrote:
jurassicmark wrote:
Superqueen500 wrote:
Stay on topic guys. I'm sure most heterosexual males on this forum are more concerned with the physical attractiveness of Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand then some random bimbo patzer.
We don't know that she's a patzer. She could be rated something like 3200.
Only if she's hiding a houdini/stockfish chip inbetween her breasts.
Go on...
jurassicmark wrote:
Superqueen500 wrote:
jurassicmark wrote:
Superqueen500 wrote:
Stay on topic guys. I'm sure most heterosexual males on this forum are more concerned with the physical attractiveness of Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand then some random bimbo patzer.
We don't know that she's a patzer. She could be rated something like 3200.
Only if she's hiding a houdini/stockfish chip inbetween her breasts.
Go on.