8335 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
ivandh
Much has been the discussion of the BEST players- a debate which quickly involves time-traveling grandmasters and such nonsense.
But who is decidedly the WORST player?
By this, I do not mean your four-year-old son who knocks the pieces about, nor that guy in the park who never develops the queenside. I mean someone who is famously inept, or failing that, someone who makes prodigious efforts to expose their lack of talent to the world of chess. Something of the type such as this:
"There was one player who would at the drop of the hat offer to play a simul of eight games, and would invariably lose every one of them."
Most likely we will have to rely on some input from our renowned historian batgirl, from days when chess was a game that noble gentlemen felt obliged to involve themselves in despite a glorious lack of talent. Nonetheless I would be interested to know about any latter-day hopeless pushers whom you have encountered, either personally in tournament play or otherwise.
verticle5
Kind of a mean topic :)....Kind of common situation here I don't remember the fellow's name, but one guy I met was telling me he was awesome at chess and always beat his friend when they played, so that pretty much made him a GM.
I explained that quantity of wins was not as important as quality. He said "but I could beat this guy like 100 times in a row easily" Again, I said, the number of wins isn't important. I could beat my 5 year old cousin 100 times. He said, yeah, but my friend is really good. I said, well, how does he lose to you 100 times in a row then?
This gambit was easily refuted by him by a counter-gambit whereby he sidestepped my variation of reasoning and disagreed/ changed the subject all in one fluid motion
echecs06
This player was my worst opponent, he stunk...
heinzie
During the years I have seen quite some hopeless cases...
NickYoung5
OK, I'll nominate Jankowski!
IshVarLan
Soon .. one and all will admit .. it is .. ISH :D
Crazychessplaya
Colonel Moreau, 0 out of 26 at Monte Carlo 1903. Never heard of again afterwards.
longday576
Id saw Euwe, but he was world champion... another to consider is Marshal, although he was great he was beaten down by the immortals, but id say Euwe more since hes played more world champions, I think, and lost horribly or didnt do good at all. At least thats what I've heard, dont take my word for it though. I guess theres a lot of people through the span of time, wasted or ignored their talent and didnt make it to the big leagues and were thought of as losers never to have made it big.
Caliphigia
Moreau was the strongest player in Monte Carlo at the time, but an amateur. He was enetred into Monte Carlo 1903 tournament to make number of players even. It's as if a player with 2000 rating was to play against Carlsen, Nakamura, Kramnik, Aronian etc in a tournament today.
Gligoric wrote that there was a player in Hastings in the 70es who at first moves used to push all his pawns one square ahead "So that the pieces have room". Only I can't remember his name.
However, the WORST player ever, IMHO, the one that "makes a prodigious effort to expose his lack of talent in chess" - it's ME.
raul72
Beniamino Vergani has to be in the running. The guy must have had a lot of pull. He had Maroczy demoted to the minor tournament at Hastings 1895 and took his place in the major tournament. He had some reputation as a blindfold player. I'm afraid the other players used him as a punching bag. Its was like a day off when you played Vergani. You didnt have to work hard, you didnt have to think hard---you let technique win for you. In a nutshell here is Vergani's bio---nobody heard much of the guy before the tournament, nobody heard much of the guy during the tournament, and nobody heard much of the guy after the tournament.
Did you ever here the expression---"Say!, who was that Italian stalion? Why that was Vergani!"
rich
Lance darling was the worst player ever. Look at this game.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1251128
The game was played april 1
Richard Wood was state champion of Oregon approx 2250.
Darling was a class A approx 1975.
goldendog
Did you know them (I see you list Oregon as your location)?
Yes, I knew Richard slightly and I would see Lance occasionally at tournaments.
kco
Chucky.
*Again, Nominates Ish as Worst Player Ever*
Bobby Fischer for not turning up in 1975 WCC.
StephenHough
Yitzd anyone?
I'll say WellRead. The No.1 Worst player.
KCO---let me explain something to you---the worst means there is nobody worse than the person you name. He is the ultimate patzer. There is no one who plays as badly as he does---capice.
You have named three players and you will have to eliminate two of them or you will be ineligible for the prize. Come on KCO---I'm pulling for you!
get a rating as low as possible
by HolyDemon a few minutes ago
connection
by _IronButterfly_ a few minutes ago
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by jetfighter13 a few minutes ago
Forgot user name and password.
by CMC_Stoker 3 minutes ago
HOW DO I JOIN A TOURNAMENT
by Metastable 5 minutes ago
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by VivaChe 5 minutes ago
Reading messages from banned members
by Cruiseylee78 6 minutes ago
Queen's Gambit question
by benonidoni 10 minutes ago
~ Game 1: Anand vs. Gelfand - 2012 ~ Analysis ~
by PardalsemCasa 10 minutes ago
Best trolling tactics you legally can do in OTB?
by Mainline_Novelty 10 minutes ago