10840 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This wasn't a well thought out essay.
I spent about 20 minutes typing this, so I don't expect all of it to be thoroughly analyzed.
You don't say.
opponents who run around the board in 1 min games if they're losing, believe they've legitmately won if they win on time.
Implying you were the real winner because you were winning on the board but not on time?
if they're up one piece they feel they've won the game.. even if I win on time
Implying you were the real winner because you won on time and not on the board?
So... isn't it true that you're the one doing what you imagine your opponent's to be doing?
They believe they've legitmately won
They take every win to their name
they feel they've won the game
Oh I see, you're projecting. You're the one who takes every win to heart and feels you should have won regardless. Well, this wasn't very hard to figure out.
Mr. Pullin, The beauty of chess lies in the simplest of facts, and it is this: You don't have to attack, but you must always defend against anything and everything. Implicit in this construct is an attack which isn't sustainable should not be initiated. Then the scenario which you've described can't occur. You have a few valid options at this point.
1. Get over it. (It's you, not them)
2. Struggle through it (like the rest of aspiring chess players)
3. Best of luck, whichever you choose.
When it comes to blitz and bullet, winning on time is just as valid as checkmating.
Perhaps you might want to consider more traditional-like time controls. You will find yourself in many more games where the win is earned through other means.
BTW, chess is very respected. I think the issue is that many blitz players don't actually respect or understand chess. They just like to push pieces around the board.
Can't stop laughing.
So what your saying is when you are winning positionally your opponent captures a piece and ruins this winning position, obviously bad sportmanship on his part. Then, as further evidence of your opponent's shear impudence, he evades being checkmated until your clock runs out of time. Clearly, he should not be awarded the victory because upon conclusion of the game your pieces make the prettiest pattern (provided pieces you were not paying attention to during play shouldn't be captured by your opponent).
Brilliant - your post is worthy of Monty Python.
Pretty close. If Cleese played chess he could make it a skit.
There's no honor in the game.
I've played over 100 opponents who run around the board in 1 min games if they're losing, and believe they've legitmately won if they win on time. They take every win to their name.. if they're up one piece they feel they've won the game.. even if you win on time, but if your up every piece on the board and they run around and win they beat you.. or get one cheapo capture that ruins your attack.
With all due respect, a lot of players who play at a level below 1200 don't have enough experience and understanding to be able to play bullet, or 3 0 blitz effectively. It's not that chess isn't respected enough, it's just that the game isn't truely appreciated enough to new players. If anything gets to the point of negatively impacting your emotions, it's best to just quit doing it.
Lower level players usually try to win on time in blitz, whereas better players don't use the clock as their primary strategy and actually play a decent game on the board.
Is bullet indecent?
Yes, of course it is, absolutely indecent!
You know who also likes to play bullet chess? That's right, the devil. :P
No offense meant, but why waste your time with speed Chess? I know, some like the quick action but your complaints seem to show that it is not for you. Not for me either. I`ve gone the other direction and my only rated Chess these days is USCF Correspondence events; it suits my temperment much better and nerves being that I`m 66.
but why waste your time with speed Chess?
...Correspondence events; it suits my temperment much better...
I think speed chess suits the temperament of some people and slower chess, other people. It's subjective, so can't be said to be a waste of time. (In point of fact, technically, it's a gain of time - playing speed chess).
I agree 100%. I see that in my own Chess club. Most of them are the lower rated players. A connection, perhaps?
Converting Chess.com to USCF
by steve_bute a few minutes ago
Is Chess,com bias toward to the Aussies ?
by kco 2 minutes ago
Draw by Insufficient Material
by kdr723 3 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by dragonair234 4 minutes ago
Bishops of the Same Color
by czechhappens 5 minutes ago
you have to do something about idiot spammers
by zBorris 7 minutes ago
1,000 signs you play chess too much.
by Chess_Clarinet 8 minutes ago
9/21/2014 - End to End
by anchul101 9 minutes ago
Can someone give me a crash course on 2 bishops #?
by zborg 21 minutes ago
by Brazil_World 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!