14555 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I cannot figure out why some players accept live games and wait for the live chess server to abort the game.
I can understand if a player accidently clicks on the challenge but how do you explain it when it happens three times or more with the same player.
That's strange. Almost all of my opponents who wait for the server to abort have a live rating of 1500+ and have excellent connections.
Could be they don't know they've been paired up yet - I've had that happen to me. I was watching a game between two players and the server paired me with an earlier game request that I had cancelled but apparently the server didn't get the message. I tried closing the browser window but that won't disconnect me from the game I am watching, and I couldn't figure out how to get back to my game.
i experience this regularly, and it happens for a number of reasons:
1. they didnt get white (or black if that was the color they wanted, but all of my consecutively aborted games seem to happen when i have white)
2. you are lower rated than they are. most people would like to play with those who are slightly stronger than they are
a. they dont know how to set their seeks to only include players with their desired rating
3. see above, slow modem
4. again they didnt get white
1. they didnt get white (or black if that was the color they wanted, but everyone seems to want to play only white)
If they don't want to play someone rated lower than themselves. Why accept the challenge in the first place? Despite my current rating I can play at the 1400 level or higher (see my best wins). I set my seeks at 1300+. In the worse case scenario a player accepted my challenge and aborted ten times in a row. (This was before the fair play policy was implemented)
yes but it seems that theres alot of people that dont realize that they can also ser their low end seeks also. i always set mine to at the very least +1 and +300
you're better off just finding another game.
Off-topic: I play checkers and sudoku occasionally.
I do not want this to become a spam thread.
How to improve from 1200?
by diphenhydramine a few minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by johnmusacha a few minutes ago
Ruth Haring: 'Girls are bad at chess'
by Chess_Genius_1 3 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by Jack_Burton 4 minutes ago
Has Carlsen got weaker watching Norway Chess
by Ludicolo_Norway 4 minutes ago
Am I too late to become a master?
by Prudentia 9 minutes ago
Bumping Old Threads
by 913Glorax12 9 minutes ago
The queen sac & blundering after that
by achja 10 minutes ago
Common rating plateaus
by Mephistaplease 20 minutes ago
7/26/2014 - Saonina-Tjekova 1980
by Gleb_Sokolov 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!