Why I suck at blitz

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
7th October 2008, 05:57pm
#21
by THEWHITEFOX
I don't know Canada
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 785

blitz and bullet chess are more of speed. To my opinion

7th October 2008, 05:59pm
#22
by photray94
United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 470

I think your opening, the Russian Game is a good choice in blitz but generally I refuse to play it accepted.

7th October 2008, 06:08pm
#23
by eriyg
iowa United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 36

usualy when i play blitz if i can take a piece i do no mater what if they are the same or the taken is of a lesser value

ex: rook for rook

kight for knight

queen for queen

7th October 2008, 06:23pm
#24
by eloihunter
Nashville United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 63

Laszlo Polgar said (and i believe science backs this up) that blitz is mostly about pattern recognition.   if you have the appropriate "board chunk" in your memory, you don't even have to think.  As his daughter Susan has several world blitz titles, I'm inclined to believe it.  the book of problems he published actually changed the way i see patterns of mate, and i'm a lot quicker.   on the attack anyway, lol...

7th October 2008, 08:00pm
#25
by zlhflans
Tampa Bay, Fl United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 2768

Man, I get nervous in blitz. There I said it. That & I lose on time. I hate time. Stupid time, Doh!

7th October 2008, 08:24pm
#26
by Ninjalol
United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 20

polgar my brain thing was kinda cool

7th October 2008, 08:26pm
#27
by Subrosian
Surrey, BC Canada
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 103

Long games also require pattern recognition to do well, though. That's why even though low-rated players calculate a position for 3 hours, they might not find a move that grandmasters would find in a minute.

8th October 2008, 08:40am
#28
by NM ozzie_c_cobblepot
United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 3859

I agree with Mr. Polgar.

8th October 2008, 09:02am
#29
by bunkerputt
Austin United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 77
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

I agree with Mr. Polgar.


I agree with ozzie_c_cobblepot.  I think I know the book eloihunter is talking about.  Is it "Chess" subheading 5334 or some odd problems where the first 900 pages or so is two move mates?  I love that book.  My wife hates it because it is so big and takes up a lot of space.

8th October 2008, 06:52pm
#30
by eloihunter
Nashville United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 63

that's the one.  i keep it in my car for when i have a few spare minutes.....i think the progression of problems is excellent for learning.

9th October 2008, 10:46am
#31
by allesmedvesek
Kačji Dol Slovenia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 40

What a surprise I thought we have played before, so I check your profile and this is what I find. I am not very good at blitz too and I don't like to study opening theory that is why I play queen's gambit way to much. Alexandra Kosteniuk says you should study all your games, but I am not following her advice very closely yet. By the way does anyone know if chess960 will be enabled on chees.com in future?

I play blitz because I want to reach rating over 1500 or maybe 1600 just to feel good about myself. Once this goal is achieved, I will probably turn my attention to long games. Because long games are more involving. (Let's be friends, tips on how to improve my English are also welcomed.)

9th October 2008, 11:37am
#32
by NM ozzie_c_cobblepot
United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 3859

I agree with bunkerputt

9th October 2008, 11:45am
#33
by bunkerputt
Austin United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 77

I'm getting a little better.  I've found the 2 12 time control helps me out.  I notice that one of my tendencies, also, is to use too much time analyzing when I'm ahead in material.  Playing the simple moves quickly without too much thought helps me avoid time pressure.  Here's a nice one where I was only in slight time pressure towards the end...

 

9th October 2008, 11:56am
#34
by bunkerputt
Austin United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 77
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

I agree with bunkerputt


Can I include that on the back flap of any future books I might write?

 

"A delightfully entertaining treatment!"

                               --The New York Times

"I agree with bunkerputt"

                               -- National Master Ozzie. C. Cobblepot

9th October 2008, 01:42pm
#35
by NM ozzie_c_cobblepot
United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 3859

Sure. But you should use my full name, Oswald Chesterfield Cobblepot.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.