19273 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Where is the "emotional bluster"? The only one using emotive language here seems to be you.
Far as I can see most of the posts are variations on theme "I don't like the fact opponent is researching moves". The easy answer to that is play OTB chess, or live chess at fast enough time controls.
I guess for higher rated players using opening books does not give much of an advantage. They know the openings anyway.
Lower/average rated players who do not use explorere or databases will be at a disadvantage.
Obviously its not necessarily a losing disadvantage, someone can use an opening book, but once out of the book, the oponenet may be superior tactically or in the end game.
If two players have the same rating then that means they play at about the same strength. If your opponent has the same rating as you but uses DBs, then his advantage in the opening must be offset by his weaknesses in the rest of the game.
I don't really get why an endgame table base is not published analysis. It is published, and it is blunt force analysis of every possible legal position.
A database on the other hand is simply a collection of games.
The endgame tablebases give perfect solutions, so if allow use there is no play at all, for positions that are applicable. It is a minor issue though because positions with small enough number of peices and/or pawns are quite rare to occur in actual game.
even in otb chess you cannot be sure of that I played a variation otb that I know and I know I have been playing the same variation against an opponent suddenly after move 7 he started looking through his notation book, I stopped him from researching move 7. which I remember that he played correct last time but not this time.
In otb play what you are describing is cheating pure and simple. It's an enforcable rule in otb play, precisely because you can see them doing it.
I agree that nobody can check opening support. No difference between having the moves in your head or in a book or database...
yes but if I left the table he would have gotten away with it.
Normally you are playing in a Tournament or Team match when playing OTB, so there is a good chance of somebody seing a person doing this. Its a clearly known and understood rule cheating when doing this in OTB games. In turn base and correspondence games there is no hope of detecting someone studying openings, and the timescale for a game is long, so you can't unlearn information that you learnt for OTB games or whatever. So there is 150 year old tradition in correspondence chess that researching isn't cheating. None of this seems to be rocket science to me .
obviously he had a bad memory since he didn't remember move 7. so somehow he unlearned it lol
The site uses a link in the game window right to the database so I assume it's not only allowed but encouraged. I try not to look too much unless I'm playing a weird line that I wonder if it's been played before, or I reach a position I'm utterly clueless how to proceed.
If you Google "databases and their discontents," you'll find an article that discusses the rules and traditions of correspondence play. In addition, you'll find reference to other discussions where folks who are ignorant of these traditions sound off.http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2011/03/databases-and-their-discontents_28.html
the only disadvantage of playing with explorer is that the oponent can play with out any blunders since moves suggested may not be the best but they are almost 100 free of blunders.
in otb you can win because you know a variation better than your opponent and he may blunder because he plays a bad move.
if people stick to the explorer they may survive the opening.
in otb a lot of players are so good in knowing the opening that people rarely survive the opening against them.
A little closer to 70% (and that only through seven or eight moves in most opening systems).
"2015 European Individual Chess Championship Round 6 - Hosts GM Alon Greenfeld and GM Ronen Har-Zvi"
by marcosite a few minutes ago
I analyse your games in live chess (free)
by Masaries a few minutes ago
3/2/2015 - Back Door Entry
by LaskerFan a few minutes ago
by C_O_N_Q_U_E_R_O_R 4 minutes ago
why dont other players adapt magnus "waiting" strategy
by sotimely 5 minutes ago
by BMeck 9 minutes ago
Question for 2000+ level players
by JamieKowalski 14 minutes ago
Albin Countergambit vs. Budapest Gambit. Which is better?
by Eugen 14 minutes ago
Prosecution against pdela
by Doggy_Style 21 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by Kycoo 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!