8390 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
While Nimzowitsch gained notoriety for this outburst, most of us can sympathize with the frustration. What are some reasons we lose to players who aren't as good as us?
Overconfidence, careless play, some physical factor such as lack of sleep, one gross blunder, thinking about something other that the game, etc. Finally, who said they didn't just get better than us?
psychology: If you are better rated, you might get sloppy if you play someone you should win against - and play moves you wouldn't play if you played against a stronger one..or/and because you know you are better you may think you can win early my coming on too hard and by doing so given the opponent a lot of possible for a counter attack.-the way I found out to play someone I should win against is to play as if the opponent was rated higher than me. there are no quick win. but sooner or later the player will lose a pawn and then another.
Well, like the diagram you posted, they make many blunders during the course of the game, and maybe their regular moves aren't so good either, then the curse of "the last mistake loses the game" thing, and you've lost. It can hurt to be better 39 out of 40 move and still lose
And even this once:
What #3 said. If I'd had been the one called an idiot, I would have punched him out.
What really gets me is when they play a junk opening, and you prove it by getting a clear plus. I guess I'm more or less expecting to win at this point, and maybe I do over press then 10 moves later here's a counter attack and I'm looking at a worse position.
So maybe it is psychology and expecting them to roll over.
another reason you may play unsound cheap tricks against players you think you can win against. In the example black tried this trap which is unsound black uses the black knight twice. but even a bad player can have learned how to avoid this trap by taking the knight or castle. Black will be behind valuable tempi because white did not take the bait.
Wafflemaster, when I played g6
Afraid I don't quite get #4, shepi13...
An ounce of action is worth a ton of theory.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
An ounce of oregano is worthless.
Waldo Emerson Waldo
Usually when I win it's because I made a dumb mistake (perhaps I'm too self-critical).
I think my knight was on f3. I know there was a back rank threat because I moved the queen and actually got mated
Someone told me that Nimzovich lost that game to Samisch~! The author of the tough Samisch variations vs the King's Indian and the Nimzo-Indian; which still stand up today.
I wonder if this is the game. Of their 10 games in the d base, Nimzovich won the other 9 ~!
No, Saemisch was a respected master with who Nimzowitsch played many games, he wouldn't have said it of him. It was some local player in the old version of a speed tournament.
Clocks in those days were rare enough and expensive enough not to be subjected to the sort of blitz abuse we do today, the usual form of speed chess then was called "rapid transit" - a bell rang every ten seconds, and the players on move had to either move instantly when it did or lose on time. There would be one bell and timekeeper for the whole event.
At the old Richmond Chess Club in the '60s (which once hosted a Fischer simul in 1964), they had an old wooden chess clock that had the bell function which could be turned on.
I have to take issue with the statement that an ounce of Oregano is worthless (?!)
Please don't invite me to your house for pizza or spaghetti if you're the cook.
anand can beat carlsen
by Arunrobin 3 minutes ago
9/19/2014 - Eric Schiller vs. D.Jackson, 1996
by Roman-Anton 5 minutes ago
why do so many reject a second game especially if they loose?
by RG1951 18 minutes ago
cheating message recieved
by deeptak 23 minutes ago
New Logic for Auto-pairing and Seek Graph!
by BRAVE_FAST_STRONG 24 minutes ago
True or false? Chess will never be solved! why?
by Thanatos_01 30 minutes ago
are chess videos really helpful...??
by tigerprowl5 30 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by Thanatos_01 37 minutes ago
European Club Cup 2014
by fabelhaft 112 minutes ago
9/18/2014 - Mate in 4
by deepak21071974 113 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!