13579 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
There can only be one queen, the other ones are mistresses.
Why ? It is the rule. Point barre.
Hello there. General had been injured during a missile attack. He is again here
Its a queen
No. He is inappropriately called a queen
I think that you are a queen in the game of drama.
i think its kinda confusing for it to be possible to have more than one Queen on the board or more than two rooks,Knights e.t.c...all in the name of promoting a pawn.makes the game horrible for the recieving end
It makes it easier for you to win. But if I already have enough mating material (such as a queen), I usually do not make my opponent suffer by promoting another pawn.
Somewhat agreed. But if there are only 4 pieces on the board, and you have 2 queens, then that is looking for a stalemate.
lol...now what do you have for us since you survived the attack?
Promote it to whatever you feel like. Why? Its part of the game called Chess. Simple.
But if you want to see a really different game and you can tune into this side of the planet then watch 4Corners on ABC1 tonight at 11.20 AEST. Please.
If a soldier reaching the 8th rank is promoted to a queen instead then one thing is obvious. The king is gay
That does not make any sense
BMeck, meet GENERALreplacesQ.
Threesome that's why
@umadbrother;lmfao...you are damn funny man! threesome in did
I know, it's so unfair; and then when the opponent gets checkmated...there should be no winners or losers in chess; every game should be a draw
This forum is one of the dumbest I have seen. The question is rather dumb.
hey babe....why do you think so?
Last Thursday I promoted one of my pawns to a second Queen in the opening (in a quick OTB game). Two moves later for a moment I forgot I had two Queens and was therefore trying to avoid a Queen trade
Luckily I regained consciousness soon after, traded one pair of Queens and mated my opponent using the other Queen.
Lurk moar. That's not even the worse thread of the week. Take for example this one, where I devoted myself to turning a sneaky thread into a dead-horse-beating one. Or this one.
Looking for active play with black
by Fiveofswords 3 minutes ago
When a coward refuses to resign.......
by Ginormicat 11 minutes ago
If Capablanca played Carlsen for the world champion match, who would win?
by DarkVlader 12 minutes ago
by Diakonia 13 minutes ago
by DamonevicSmithlov 13 minutes ago
WHY DO YOU PLAY CHESS ?
by marcomarco13 18 minutes ago
Your analysis chess set
by szociofoto 24 minutes ago
What to learn as black if I am going to play 1...e5?
by ruben72d 26 minutes ago
Best way to learn openings. . suggestions please
by PossibleOatmeal 31 minutes ago
The paradox of perfect chess
by bb_gum234 45 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!