10982 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Not a chance. Carlsen presses until it's completely dead. If he did, he would be giving away his advantage. He doesn't get big advantages out of the opening very often.
The match took 48 games and karpov was leading 5-3 when the match was stopped.
You do know that the match lasted 5 months!
It's safe to say that it was an interesting experiment, but in the end it didn't work.
And Carlsen declined Anand's draw offer :p
Lol. David, I'm surprised you're not a member of the Carlsen cheer squad :)
Unlike Anand's earlier decision, we all know it was pointless to decline that draw at move 40.
I give respect where I consider it's due, and I also shoot down criticisms I see as undue.
People complain about early draws. People complain about playing out long draws. People complain about draws being offered, and people complain about draws being declined.
Then there are people in the opposite camp, who praise all those exact same things. It seems to come down to which player the person favours, more than the actual circumstances.
It's very easy for everyone to be an armchair superGM when sat at home with three engines, two sets of professional commentary, and a couple of forums' worth of live kibitzing.
I guess I just believe in giving the guys who are actually in the championship a bit of a break, as they must just do whatever they think best while under pressure to try to win the competition.
You say "we all know" it was pointless to decline the draw at move 40; apparently Carlsen didn't, and it probably wasn't because his understanding of chess was so much less than yours.
#144 - Aplause! Thanks, now I hope everyone will read it.
I was pointing out that there was a qualitative difference between the two declinations. The first was during a tense middle game with chances for both sides, while the second was during a theoretically drawn endgame.
The difference in competitive merit between these two declinations is my opinion, which you seem to disagree with, and that is fine. But to say that my opinion is not valid because Carlsen is a GM and I am not, I do not accept.
I think some people over here would love Carlsen to play a lone K vs K position for 50 moves and call it "fighting for a win" spirit, rather than watching the actual content the game has to offer in a short but tense game.
The best players in the world know when a position is dead, and Carlsen knew it too. He has been known in the past to play until bare kings, and this was just about the same. If he had really wanted to "fight on", he would not have allowed the pawn exchanges.
Carlsen agreed to the draw by exchanging off all the pawns as quickly as possible. He should have done it by... agreeing to the draw.
Perhaps he reads the threads and realises people need insufficient material to understand it as a draw.
why do you say insufficient material, Carlsen could have played on for a win instead of being such a pacifist.
Wow! Mate in eight! Who knew? That should be tomorrow's problem of the day.
Nalimov knew. Plugged it in and it works out just as shown.
Then he should have played
Hmm. Bishops of opposite colors are "fighting' endgames. But, soo sorry t'be sarcastic, without any pawns it's clearly drawn. Everyone should know that. Dunno. If your engine is truly ahead of it's time...but it's an farce, hate to break it to you, to think anyone could conceivably play for an win, much less mate.
Chess Sets Addiction-Does Your Wife Or Girlfriend...?
by ROBB_CHESS a few minutes ago
What do you like to play with Black against e4?
by Spiritbro77 7 minutes ago
True or false? Chess will never be solved! why?
by Akatsuki64 7 minutes ago
why do so many reject a second game especially if they loose?
by kleelof 7 minutes ago
Download Tournament games
by Badukdestroyer 10 minutes ago
Is there ANYONE who can challenge ZOD?
by TonyZhao 10 minutes ago
9/18/2014 - Mate in 4
by mayo_mayo 14 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by December_TwentyNine 30 minutes ago
by Akatsuki64 38 minutes ago
cheating message recieved
by Spiritbro77 45 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!