20042 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
No, an exabyte database is nowhere near large enough, too small by many orders of magnitude.
Will Technology ruin the game of chess?
An interesting, much debated question. Personally, I do not really see, how it will ruin the game of chess.
In post #245, Shackoo made a good point: Engines will eventually analyze all chess positions. That is true, but however, I don't expect it to be humanlly possible to memorize the best move in all such positions.
Of course, generalizations about what moves are usually best to play in which type of position will help humans a lot, but many of these generalizations already exist, and there are countless exceptions.
In terms of cheating, computers help cheaters by a very large factor. But by scanning the area for electronics and other ways of detection (both for Over-the-Board games and Online Games), cheating is kept to a limit.
In any case, if chess is ruined by chess engines (unlikely, in my opinion), humans can always rely on Fischer Random chess or other formats such as Bughouse for at least a couple of centuries.
Thus, my answer to this question is: No.
Well no, it isn't. You can only say this if you just don't understand how vastly BIG the game of chess is. I know lots of people just don't get big numbers but all you need is a spreadsheet and some multiplication and division to show that this is not going to happen for a few billion years, if ever.
And even if it could be done the storage requirements to store all the possible positions and their solutions would require more matter than is in the visible universe.
Chess is BIG. Really, really BIG. Of course Go is even bigger, vastly bigger than chess.
Computers have already analyzed all six-piece positions. I said that it will Eventually happen, which means it will happen at some moment in time.
Taikyoku Shogi anyone?
You just don't have any clue about big numbers, do you? Six pieces isn't even a start on analysing the whole game.
It's hardly even a start on analyzing all seven-piece positions. Exponents are tough to comprehend.
Saying we got from 2^0 to 2^6 doesn't mean we're half way to 2^12.
6 man table base is not even 1% of 1% of 1% etc.
Technology helps chess.
A lesson on exponential growth should be compulsory in all school curricula.
If it does, it's not in our life time.
Chess is a draw, even in the days of capablanca this was realised. People win because humans cannot calculate all the tactics or understand all the ideas of chess. Don't see how computers will change this. They may be able to one day prove the existence of the draw. A forklift truck might be designed that can lift a mountain, don't think it will stop weightlifting competitions.
Technology HAS ruined the game of chess. Every since they started using those infernal clocks, chess has gone to the dogs.
Ever since they made those"pawns", the game has gone mad
Apperently, Computers Suggest Chess is NOT a draw and hence whoever Gos first has an advantage. Yes i know that computers are not perfect but doesn't going first give a "nudge' of delovopment advantage? White has a edge[according to me]
It already has. Have to endure endless nitwits commenting on games based on what their search engine tells them because they can't think for themselves. And the most hilarious part is that many comment this way as if they're gms and are critical of players 1000 x stronger.
And that's why the game will be just fine for some time. Those nitwits you speak of will play in some otb games, and will only have the assistance of their minds.
Basically, the computer age has helped those that play straight, and hindered those that use it as a crutch.
How kids improve faster in chess???
by RSK_Asherz 2 minutes ago
Surviving the Caro-Kann Advance Variation
by ylblai2 6 minutes ago
by Diakonia 7 minutes ago
Chess Bazaar's New Soviet Set--A Pictorial Review
by rcmacmillan 8 minutes ago
problems in middle games
by Diakonia 8 minutes ago
Will I be able to reach Master level?
by Harvey_Wallbanger 10 minutes ago
I know the openings, but when to use them?
by ylblai2 12 minutes ago
10/8/2015 - Tolush - Alatortsev, Moscow 1948
by rcjekt 16 minutes ago
by BarbieMassacre 23 minutes ago
Free chess books
by weasin 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!