11580 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Ron Burgundy put it perfectly:
"I'm a man who discovered the wheel and built the Eiffel Tower out of metal and brawn. That's what kind of man I am. You're just a woman with a small brain. With a brain a third the size of us. It's science."
Do we know who discovered the wheel? A woman's brain is smaller, but not by 1/3.
Wow. Lighten up, Sunshine. That was clearly a joke.. even mentioned the comedy from which it was drawn from...
This whole thing took a pretty bad turn. When people are actually arguing if the quality of play is currently anything close to the same in the WWCC as the WCC. That's not sexist, it's just a fact.
My only question is why do men even care? Yeah, currently women on the averages, play at a lower level than their counterparts. They have their own comeptitions so that women can win. We do the same thing in athletics, where the disadvantages are even more pronounced. Maybe one day, it will be uneccessary. That day is not now. So yeah, women should have their own league. And no, it's not insulting. It's accomodating.
Post #229: I would instead say he has every right to answer it, just that it's unlikely to be as accurate as a woman's answer in this case. But anyone can evaluate the accuracy of his answer as they see fit. If for example it's inaccurate for a person to say that these titles are taken as an insult by most women, or ought to be, then the people reading such a statement can simply decide to not adopt that opinion.
@Goldenturd - I wouldn't call it a joke, since it seems he wants to get me mad. That's what trolls do. It's a big joke to them. It doesn't bother me though. After i type my say, i'm off to the next post or thread to read.
Yeah, i don't think anybody is arguing whether level of play is equal to the WWC. The problem seems to be people think they don't deserve the amount of money they receive. The fact is, the WCC does have a larger pot, but they distribute it differently. If the WCC distributed it the way the WWCC does (60/40), then the WCC champion would be winning about 200k more than the WWCC champion. It's the distribution that makes it seem unfair. Any money they generated for the pot, the players deserve to win. So even if they were total beginners, but people were willing to pay and sponsor the event so that the pot was $1 mil, then the players deserved it.
@Elubas - Yes. I may not be accurate or even right, but i do have a right to speak my mind (with limitations). If what i said was wrong, then simply prove me wrong or don't believe what i said. I don't mind; I'm just offering a different opinion, and hopefully a correct one.
Edit: @Elubas - No one woman can answer for all women either. Asking for women's opinion on it is only better because one can begin a tally. However, without a significantly large sample size, it doesn't mean much as statistical evidence.
Then I don't disgaree at all. If a bunch of 8 year olds paid to enter a tourny for kids only and ended up with a bigger pot than both of those, I'd think that's fair, too.
As for the joke... if you haven't seen the movie (pretty funny, btw), he's quoting a character that is chariacature of 70's chauvenism resisting a woman who is superior to him at his proffession (and clearly his intellectual superior).
Anyway, threads about dead. To sum up: womens's events are fine. Women seem to have less of an affinity for chess in general, reasons debatable. Statistics would insist that eventually a woman will win a non-women's championship. And finally, why do men care that much?
Great summing up, @GoldenT. Username too.
A summing up containing many errors, so not that great really, actually pretty dumb.
Anyway it seems our favourite bottle blonde is struggling, perhaps not surprising given the rating differential.
@GT - Nope, haven't seen the movie. There's more that's being said which makes his posts more trollish than just being a joke. I'll leave it at that.
There could be many reasons why men "care." One reason could be to point out the 'fairness' of it, and use it as a counter argument to the gender wage dispute. I'm sure you and others can come up with more reasons if you think about it.
My best games
by M_Sameer2010 3 minutes ago
8/21/2014 - Movsesian vs A.Korobov, Moscow, 2004
by Hogan9600 7 minutes ago
how did this game escalate so fast?
by shell_knight 13 minutes ago
# of rated players worldwide ?
by hicetnunc 17 minutes ago
Judit Polgar: the greatest prodigy ever ? Is a JOKE!
by WorldChessNews 17 minutes ago
What if a girl became World Chess Champion?
by WorldChessNews 27 minutes ago
Hello GM, Penguin is Carlsen
by shell_knight 34 minutes ago
Chess piece storage box that is well made & reasonable
by WorldChessNews 36 minutes ago
Chess device I wish existed
by tigerprowl5 40 minutes ago
30 Day Diamond Refund
by amcanomer 71 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!