Forums

Would you trust this man?

Sort:
rooperi

SebLeb0210

Who is this man ?

rooperi

He wrote a book I'm trying to read.

But I'm finding many errors. (with a little help from Stockfish)

Xilmi

He looks very grim and serious. His clothing-style also suggests some kind of elitism. The overall impression is almost politicianesque.

So no, I don't think I'd trust him unless having spoken to him would reveal that despite his looks he is a nice guy afterall.

bigpoison

He appears to be over thirty.

heinzie

never trust anyone from Belgium

secrekept2

Is that you OP?

rooperi
heinzie wrote:

never trust anyone from Belgium

I know, right. They have a thing about pi$$ing in the drinking water.

NobbyCapeTown

Black and white photos always look suspect

rooperi

rooperi

In series of 13 lessons, grandmaster O'Kelly shows you how you can improve your play to master standard (200 plus on the BCF rating scale, 2200 plus on the FIDE scale)

Well, that didnt really work for me. lol

Scottrf
rooperi wrote:

 

Well, that didnt really work for me. lol


Put Stockfish away then!

VLaurenT
rooperi wrote:

In series of 13 lessons, grandmaster O'Kelly shows you how you can improve your play to master standard (200 plus on the BCF rating scale, 2200 plus on the FIDE scale)

Well, that didnt really work for me. lol

I think over-relying on engines may cloud your own judgment.

waffllemaster

Two different styles.

Playing moves that involve a general understanding of the position and lead to positions that can be navigated with logic will get you to 2200.

Alternatively you can have stockfish teach you how to play.  This method involves calculating millions of positions per second and will get you to 3000 level play.

It's not so much that one disproves the other.  Choose the one you think best fits your ability.

rooperi
hicetnunc wrote:
rooperi wrote:

In series of 13 lessons, grandmaster O'Kelly shows you how you can improve your play to master standard (200 plus on the BCF rating scale, 2200 plus on the FIDE scale)

Well, that didnt really work for me. lol

I think over-relying on engines may cloud your own judgment.

The book has a bunch of excercises.

Ver rarely does he include alternate lines in his analysis. So, I'm naturall curious what happens in those lines.

Sometimes, I find it by mself

When I'm unable to do that, I get help from an engine. Mostly, the engine finds good solid lines with the intended result.

But, so far, I must have found half a dozen solutions which don't work, there are responses which busts the premise of the study/puzzle.

Also, the organization of the book is haphazard, the excercises after each chapter has nothing to do with the contents of the chapter.

I have found one or two real gems amongst the excercises, but all in all, I don't think O'Kelly de Galway is one of m favourite authors.

 

{edit sorryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, the yyyyyyyyyyy on m keboard works only when it wants to

bigpoison

Irishman are, often, inscrutable authors.

VLaurenT

Well, I understand, but it's really difficult to find flawless examples in the pre-engine times. You have to accept that those books contain some mistakes (hopefully not too many as O'Kelly was a great analyst and correspondence players.)

As for the exercises, it's true they are completely unrelated to the lessons Smile

Grinmaster

Of course I trust him.  I bought a used car from him last week.

Aetheldred

He was a GM, more than enough for us mortals. Stockfish is very useful if you can calculate up to 20 moves ahead. 

Crazychessplaya

I dunno. "Kelly's Heroes" is not the same as "O'Kelly's Heroes."