Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Yereslov's Immortal


  • 13 months ago · Quote · #101

    mrguy888

    He did not tell any lies. He never claimed to be giving anything but his own opinion. Therefore what he said was not false and not slander.

    Continuing to say he was slandering you would be slandering him, by constrast. You would be maliciously defaming him for something he didn't do.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #102

    hydra314

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 13 months ago · Quote · #103

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:

    He did not tell any lies. He never claimed to be giving anything but his own opinion. Therefore what he said was not false and not slander.

    Continuing to say he was slandering you would be slandering him, by constrast. You would be maliciously defaming him for something he didn't do.

    The rules state not to attack other users. 

    Stop trying to justify it with your own opinions.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #104

    mrguy888

    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    He did not tell any lies. He never claimed to be giving anything but his own opinion. Therefore what he said was not false and not slander.

    Continuing to say he was slandering you would be slandering him, by constrast. You would be maliciously defaming him for something he didn't do.

    The rules state not to attack other users. 

    Stop trying to justify it with your own opinions.

    I am not justifying it or claiming it was not a personal attack. All I am saying is that it was not a slanderous attack.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #105

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    He did not tell any lies. He never claimed to be giving anything but his own opinion. Therefore what he said was not false and not slander.

    Continuing to say he was slandering you would be slandering him, by constrast. You would be maliciously defaming him for something he didn't do.

    The rules state not to attack other users. 

    Stop trying to justify it with your own opinions.

    I am not justifying it or claiming it was not a personal attack. All I am saying is that it was not a slanderous attack.

    It's based on an opinion.

    Helzeth has yet to post a refutation.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #106

    Helzeth

    Actually, you know what. I like the idea of you getting banned more than you being reasoned out of your idiotic retardation trip.

    I already pmed you the list of all the people who reported you.


    ..the list is growing ;)

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #107

    mrguy888

    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    He did not tell any lies. He never claimed to be giving anything but his own opinion. Therefore what he said was not false and not slander.

    Continuing to say he was slandering you would be slandering him, by constrast. You would be maliciously defaming him for something he didn't do.

    The rules state not to attack other users. 

    Stop trying to justify it with your own opinions.

    I am not justifying it or claiming it was not a personal attack. All I am saying is that it was not a slanderous attack.

    It's based on an opinion.

    Helzeth has yet to post a refutation.

     The two things you just said were unrelated to my post. They are also things that I don't care about.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #108

    mrguy888

    Helzeth wrote:

    Actually, you know what. I like the idea of you getting banned more than you being reasoned out of your idiotic retardation trip.

    I already pmed you the list of all the people who reported you.


    ..the list is growing ;)

    You are on quite the "idiotic retardation trip" yourself...

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #109

    Yereslov

    Helzeth wrote:

    Actually, you know what. I like the idea of you getting banned more than you being reasoned out of your idiotic retardation trip.

    I already pmed you the list of all the people who reported you.


    ..the list is growing ;)

    What's with the insults?

    I haven't broken a single rule.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #110

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    He did not tell any lies. He never claimed to be giving anything but his own opinion. Therefore what he said was not false and not slander.

    Continuing to say he was slandering you would be slandering him, by constrast. You would be maliciously defaming him for something he didn't do.

    The rules state not to attack other users. 

    Stop trying to justify it with your own opinions.

    I am not justifying it or claiming it was not a personal attack. All I am saying is that it was not a slanderous attack.

    It's based on an opinion.

    Helzeth has yet to post a refutation.

     The two things you just said were unrelated to my post. They are also things that I don't care about.

    An opinion is slanderous if it is not related to the truth.

    Being an expert in chess does not mean that person is intelligent anymore than being a track star makes you a genius.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #111

    mrguy888

    But it is related to truth. His opinion is based on what you posted.

    The second thing you said is true but unrelated. I like mangos.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #112

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:

    But it is related to truth. His opinion is based on what you posted.

    The second thing you said is true but unrelated. I like mangos.

    It is related. Don't blame your poor reading comprehension on someone else.

    There is no truth in a statement if you just say it.

    Calling the sky "red" doesn't make it "red."

    Like I said, chess has nothing to do with intelligence.

    The best players are child prodigies.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #113

    mrguy888

    But he did not just say it. He exchanged posts on this forum and during your game which he processed and developed an opinion on.

    It is hypocrytical say his opinion is void because you just said that he just said it.

    Pears are a great fruit.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #114

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:

    But he did not just say it. He exchanged posts on this forum and during your game which he processed and developed an opinion on.

    It is hypocrytical say his opinion is void because you just said that he just said it.

    Pears are a great fruit.

    He hasn't given an opinion.

    He has been trolling and insulting the whole time.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #115

    mrguy888

    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    But he did not just say it. He exchanged posts on this forum and during your game which he processed and developed an opinion on.

    It is hypocrytical say his opinion is void because you just said that he just said it.

    Pears are a great fruit.

    He hasn't given an opinion.

    He has been trolling and insulting the whole time.

    Now you are just contradicting both yourself and reality. I am bored of you if you can't produce new material.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #116

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    But he did not just say it. He exchanged posts on this forum and during your game which he processed and developed an opinion on.

    It is hypocrytical say his opinion is void because you just said that he just said it.

    Pears are a great fruit.

    He hasn't given an opinion.

    He has been trolling and insulting the whole time.

    Now you are just contradicting both yourself and reality. I am bored of you if you can't produce new material.

    Stop trolling.

    If you don't like my posts, get out.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #117

    mrguy888

    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    But he did not just say it. He exchanged posts on this forum and during your game which he processed and developed an opinion on.

    It is hypocrytical say his opinion is void because you just said that he just said it.

    Pears are a great fruit.

    He hasn't given an opinion.

    He has been trolling and insulting the whole time.

    Now you are just contradicting both yourself and reality. I am bored of you if you can't produce new material.

    Stop trolling.

    If you don't like my posts, get out.

    Trolling is a team effort, I won't stop if you don't. I give a 90% chance that you don't get what I mean though.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #118

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:
    Yereslov wrote:
    mrguy888 wrote:

    But he did not just say it. He exchanged posts on this forum and during your game which he processed and developed an opinion on.

    It is hypocrytical say his opinion is void because you just said that he just said it.

    Pears are a great fruit.

    He hasn't given an opinion.

    He has been trolling and insulting the whole time.

    Now you are just contradicting both yourself and reality. I am bored of you if you can't produce new material.

    Stop trolling.

    If you don't like my posts, get out.

    Trolling is a team effort, I won't stop if you don't. I give a 90% chance that you don't get what I mean though.

    I read your profile, so I'm done feeding you.

    You seem to be famous for being a douche around Chess.com.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #119

    mrguy888

    Because chessgrandmaster2012 and Vlad thinks so? If you post on this site you get a hate note from Vlad. cgm2012 got mad at me because I added him when he tried to create a list of evil people on chess.com.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #120

    Yereslov

    mrguy888 wrote:

    Because chessgrandmaster2012 and Vlad thinks so? If you post on this site you get a hate note from Vlad. cgm2012 got mad at me because I added him when he tried to create a list of evil people on chess.com.

    It was more than two players.


Back to Top

Post your reply: