13191 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
He did not tell any lies. He never claimed to be giving anything but his own opinion. Therefore what he said was not false and not slander.
Continuing to say he was slandering you would be slandering him, by constrast. You would be maliciously defaming him for something he didn't do.
The rules state not to attack other users.
Stop trying to justify it with your own opinions.
I am not justifying it or claiming it was not a personal attack. All I am saying is that it was not a slanderous attack.
It's based on an opinion.
Helzeth has yet to post a refutation.
Actually, you know what. I like the idea of you getting banned more than you being reasoned out of your idiotic retardation trip.I already pmed you the list of all the people who reported you...the list is growing ;)
The two things you just said were unrelated to my post. They are also things that I don't care about.
You are on quite the "idiotic retardation trip" yourself...
What's with the insults?
I haven't broken a single rule.
An opinion is slanderous if it is not related to the truth.
Being an expert in chess does not mean that person is intelligent anymore than being a track star makes you a genius.
But it is related to truth. His opinion is based on what you posted.
The second thing you said is true but unrelated. I like mangos.
It is related. Don't blame your poor reading comprehension on someone else.
There is no truth in a statement if you just say it.
Calling the sky "red" doesn't make it "red."
Like I said, chess has nothing to do with intelligence.
The best players are child prodigies.
But he did not just say it. He exchanged posts on this forum and during your game which he processed and developed an opinion on.
It is hypocrytical say his opinion is void because you just said that he just said it.
Pears are a great fruit.
He hasn't given an opinion.
He has been trolling and insulting the whole time.
Now you are just contradicting both yourself and reality. I am bored of you if you can't produce new material.
If you don't like my posts, get out.
Trolling is a team effort, I won't stop if you don't. I give a 90% chance that you don't get what I mean though.
I read your profile, so I'm done feeding you.
You seem to be famous for being a douche around Chess.com.
Because chessgrandmaster2012 and Vlad thinks so? If you post on this site you get a hate note from Vlad. cgm2012 got mad at me because I added him when he tried to create a list of evil people on chess.com.
It was more than two players.
by QueenTakesKnightOOPS a few minutes ago
12/13/2013 - Back Rank Power
by oko7 a few minutes ago
can anybody tell what this rating system is about?
by 2f4 13 minutes ago
Help Arena GUI
by EscherehcsE 14 minutes ago
1.e4 Nf6 2. e5 :-(
by chesschamp0819 16 minutes ago
If you can change a chess rule or create a chess rule, what would it be ?
by jbomber732 17 minutes ago
can a women ever become world chess champion
by Sangwin 23 minutes ago
Best opening for white
by watcha 23 minutes ago
by Shivsky 25 minutes ago
I am quitting chess.
by ConnorMacleod_151 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!