Yet another Stats project: Correlation between years of chess experience compared to USCF/FIDE ratin

Jump to forum:
 
18th July 2008, 07:43am
#1
by Am3692
Newbury Park, CA United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 542

I'm back with another statistics project, and this time, it's about correlation. So, I decided to choose the topic: is there a correlation between years of chess experience vs USCF/FIDE rating. There should be a correlation, but then again, there are those outliers aka super prodigies, so hopefully this will be interesting. So, please post your rating and the number of years of chess you played (Put number of years for competitive chess). Thanks in advance. 

 


18th July 2008, 07:52am
#2
by Phobetor
Eindhoven Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 658

Am3692 wrote:

I'm back with another statistics project, and this time, it's about correlation. So, I decided to choose if there is a correlation between years of chess experience vs USCF/FIDE rating.


You're going to choose if there's a correlation between experience and rating? :P

Number of years I played competitive chess: ~10

FIDE rating: 2219


18th July 2008, 08:28am
#3
by Am3692
Newbury Park, CA United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 542

I misstated. I chose the topic. Not if there is an actual correlation.


18th July 2008, 05:13pm
#4
by Ziryab
Washington United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 239

Playing 40 years

Playing USCF rated events 12 years

Current USCF rating 1750


18th July 2008, 05:37pm
#5
by erik
Mountain View, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 6442

playing chess for 12 years. 1550 (USCF), but i'm slightly stronger than that.


18th July 2008, 06:32pm
#6
by sstteevveenn
Wales United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 1113

just to be awkward

hmm, played for a year when i just started, lost all in the first half, won all in the second half, got grade ~1100

went to uni played for half a year - no idea even how strong my opponents were because of lame bcf grades. 

didnt play at all for maybe 3 years

started again (stupidly difficult given i'd ony played for a year before, wasnt very good, and only stopped for a few years, but I could barely calculate simple exchanges to start with for some reason) - 1382

after another year, ie now, I think it will be ~1500 but it's not out yet. 

This time next year, probably lower than that. 

 

So i guess that's 3.5 years but with a big gap in the middle

 


18th July 2008, 07:51pm
#7
by mytself
youngstown,ohio United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 433

Playing 50 yrs. competively 9 yrs. highest 2120 thirty years ago.


18th July 2008, 08:53pm
#8
by NM tonydal
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1139

Sorry, but I don't think this makes a whole lotta sense.  It's only going to be meaningful if you do something like ask how long it took older players to achieve their peak rating (since after all younger ones might still be peaking, or have peaks ahead...hm, looks like I'm wearing out this metaphor).

 

To answer your question anyway, I played competitive chess (USCF) for roughly 15 years, though for a few years in there it was just one or two tourneys a year.  My last published rating (a couple years back) was 2177.  Highest was 2290--14 years after I started to play in tournaments.


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.