10547 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Personally I understand what you are saying. While I'm not claiming any type of chess superiority, I find it frustrating as well. However, I try and determine what is his weaknesses. What must I do to prepare to punish them. In poker there is a saying "Punish the limpers" Same thing in chess. Some guy brings his queen and bishop out for an early attack, I will re-arrange my moves to keep him moving his queen while I'm getting my army out. Punish them for poor development. Use your better development to crush them.
I also found very helpful was studying mating patterns and techniques. You would be suprised how much you can punish a king in the middle of the board with no development
1) I tried everything I could to get as into poker as I am into chess and I just couldn't do it. It's a great game, but Chess is definitely more for me.
2) Tempo and development is the key, indeed. Once his "premature" attack fails, he'll wind up with less development and in a position where either attacking or defending, he'll have less fire power where it's needed. He won't be able to respond to your threats nor mount serious threats of his own.
I like both games. I go back and forth between poker and chess and surpisingly, both of them help me get better at the other. In chess, opponent just blasted through with his queen. In poker, you are facing a large river bet. Both cases, you have to evaluate everything to determine if your opponent can win. You always have more information in chess. I personally love to look at Tal's games. He's an amazing attacker, never afraid of an exchange and was absolutely brilliant at opening up attacking lines.
Sorry got a little off topic. In chess, if you opponent wants to neglect proper development to instead start trading pieces and attacking before they are developed, remember to punish him for his errors. In poker, you're on the button and have 7 limpers in front of you, punish them, raise. Doesn't matter what you're cards are. Although, watchout for the 1st person in, he might be holding the goods. Always keep evaluating your situation.
One word: Variance. I hate it. I cannot stand watching guys get lucky on the river.
If someone does a "premature attack" then by definition he is making a mistake and it is quite often a losing mistake.
So my thesis is you should not "avoid" situations where someone does a "premature" attack. Instead you should learn how to deal with premature attacks and then you will welcome "premature attacks"
Please Analyse My Game
by shepi13 9 minutes ago
5/25/2015 - Mate or Queen
by levan_liluashvili 10 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by power_2_the_people 11 minutes ago
Different types of chess
by Qi1 14 minutes ago
USCF Online Rated Tournaments
by Jion_Wansu 15 minutes ago
Attn: King's Gambit Players
by Oraoradeki 16 minutes ago
My opponent resigned but i dont know why
by thechessplaya5 25 minutes ago
What are the sharpest D4 cont.
by Andre_Harding 26 minutes ago
The problems of picking a chess hero
by bb_gum234 28 minutes ago
i feel bad for both UK and America chess
by Ion_223ui 35 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!