13729 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
No, I was already over 2000 FIDE.
I would agree with kikvors' overall assessment of the contents : I was also more at home in the tactical chapters (though some of them are quite challenging anyway) and found the strategy chapters more difficult.
If you're not sure, you can also start with the blue books - there's a lot of interesting material there too.
Here are samples of medium (**) exercises in the first orange book :
Thanks for the clarification hicetnunc. I will start with the orange books.
man im bad.. ratings here are really inflated
posting just to bookmark this discussion
I should check this out.
I've been working on Build up your Chess 1 for a couple of months now and I'm seeing improvement OTB already. Not much mind you, but I found the first two chapters on Mating Motifs very difficult and after I'd worked through them I learned a lot of new patterns and attacks some of which I used in my games. I have a long way to go but I think Yusupov is honest about the level of calculation and analysis required to improving one's rating - too many players want 'GM in one week' type books that are unrealistic.
the first puzzle, "puzzled" me. It was quite easy to spot the first move. A bit harder to find the second as there where 2 choises, the rest seems straight forward , but i did wrong because there is also an alternate checkmate:
@ghillan - I guess you can award yourself 2pts. as well
Of course i would do, but when it happens, i spend half hour triing to figure out "why the hell the other way doesn't work?!?". Only to realize that there is nothing wrong with the opther solution. Obviously we can consider it as another way to exercise, but rage raises when i find out that i spend a lot of time looking for an error that doesn't exist!
Good puzzles should have only one solution, or mention all the possible solutions, or stop earlier.
I really hate when puzzles tells that i did wrong, but actually there are alternate solution ( with the same number of moves)
After 4. g4+, 4... Bxg4. No mate on the next move.
a-ha!! here it is!
Do Americans tend to flame more on live chess
by DrSpudnik a few minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by TomHaegin 5 minutes ago
Tata Steel 2015
by Synaphai 6 minutes ago
how long to be good enough to beat computer on expert?
by astronomer999 6 minutes ago
Time Control Changes?
by chessdragonboge 7 minutes ago
Need someone to stop me from smashing my laptop
by blitzjoker 8 minutes ago
1/26/2015 - Richard Teichmann vs. NN, Berlin, 1914
by m_majid_khan 10 minutes ago
Hebden - Hodgson 1985
by thecentipede 11 minutes ago
Caro Kann themes and positional tips
by lolurspammed 12 minutes ago
Your Playing Style and Who You Emulate
by bigboss987 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!