17621 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'd like to get my average time down so I can enter certain tournaments. How many (most recent?) games are used to calculate it?
The average time per move is calculated from ALL of your games, not just recent ones. As you continue to play quick moves in your current games you should see your average time per move go gradually down.
Which is a problem if you have a lot of games. I think it should reflect current habits, not historical ones.
How often is this stat recalculated? Weekly? Monthly? Mine has not budged even one minute despite many recent, rapid moves. It does not seem mathematically possible.
I have the same problem. My average time has been at 3 hours 15 minutes for about a year; it's hard to imagine that I could really be that consistent. Maybe a bug?
I suspect a software bug. It rarely changes. Mine had been stuck at 9 hours until I posted here, then magically dropped to 8 hours 45 minutes. Odd to see such a 'dramatic' change instead of working its way down minute by minute? Now its been stuck at 8 hours 45 minutes - maybe this post will help. :)
Yep. It can be a problem if you have a lot of games under your belt, but now you are moving a lot quicker than you did, say, last year. One could be restricted from joining quick tournaments.
I really don't understand why time per move is for all your games, but the t/o ratio is 90 days. Both should be fairly similar and more reflective of one's more recent play.
Well, I have 6000 games here, at 60 mins per move.
If I play my next 500 games at 10 mins per move, my avg time will change to 56 mins.
Well, I only have 387 games, and some of these ended after only one move on my part (the opponent never responded). I've never timed out on a game. Nevertheless, I would think my avg time would change relatively quickly, especially when it is 9 hours per move! I am convinced there is a software bug.
I agree that it'd be better to calculate on recent games only.
mine never changes.
The statistic is simply rounded to the nearest 15 minutes. When I first joined the site, it was accurate to the nearest minute, so it changed much more frequently. These days, we only see "3 hrs" or "3 hrs 15 min," etc.
where does this stat show up?
Go to your home and click on your "Online Chess" stats.
If it is calculated from ALL games, then I assume that live chess counts? Else the statement on the website should be amended.
@hankstr: The statistic pertains only to Online Chess (correspondence) games. This is why it appears on the Online Chess page, but not the Live Chess page.
@hankstr: I just found this webpage:
The article specifies that the average time per move pertains only to Online Chess.
I agree with many of the comments already made... Like timeouts, time/move should reflect more recent habits. I've had this account for four years, and taking into account my entire chess.com playing history won't be helpful at all to someone trying to figure out how quickly I will be likely to play in the upcoming days/weeks.
Just tought I'd echo some of the points made so maybe the powers that be will hear our collective voice :)At the very least, it'd be nice to hear staff's rationale for not changing it to a 90 day memory. Even 120 or 180 day might better capture recent playing habits, but forever is too long.
Count me in too for the 90 day memory. I'm also waiting to hear the staff's rationale for not changing to this.
I see there is no answer to this question from Staff even after 2 years. I agree with the sentiment above. If 90 days is too simple, then perhaps a weighted moving average, giving most weight to recent games.
"2015 Sinquefield Cup Round 5"
Can women be as good at chess?
by X_PLAYER_J_X a few minutes ago
Contra 1.d4 Against 1.d4.
by Pablouned a few minutes ago
who invented the chess and when?
by TheronG12 3 minutes ago
How large does a town need to be to start a chess club?
by SilentKnighte5 4 minutes ago
Studying openings is highly UNDERrated!
by Arawn_of_Annuvin 10 minutes ago
8/27/2015 - Using All The Pieces
by Conseiller 17 minutes ago
by mkkuhner 19 minutes ago
+1000 point upset in Corsica!
by -BEES- 25 minutes ago
what is my true rating?
by bb_gum234 27 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal Sicilian Defense Variations - Championship Round!
by RivertonKnight 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!