9142 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
It wasn't the best move, how does that make it a mistake? I do not believe chess is about finding the best move. As long as you don't miss checkmate, if you have correct ideas and calculate correctly there could potentially be 5 best moves. Although, ultimately, in this case it is clearly not the best move, I would still not call it a mistake. Appreciate your input though, I'll reconsider my beliefs.
Let's say I'm a hitman on a hit. I have the option to shoot them with a gun, or a crossbow. Both will be killshots, but the crossbow will be slow - obviously the gun is the better decision.
Yes. But how did you get there?
Car, van, bike...
An A on a test is good, buts its not perfect, you could have done better, if you didnt get 100% then you made mistakes. But regardless of how you define mistake, the definition the analysis uses is based on it not being the best move and clearly missing something (for example a slower mate) In this case I would definitly consider it a mistake because it took an extra turn, so in a speed game or if you were almost out of time, then the extra move could lose you the game
I suppose I agree with that.
I have finally proved the computer analysis is incorrect, misleading, and just generally annoying. Somehow, I reached the exact same position in two bullet games after move 22. In one I then played:
22. ...Ke7 (-8.56) which was a "mistake" as the "best move" was 22. ...Nd6 (-8.96).
In the other game I played:
22. ...Nd6 AND IT WAS A "MISTAKE"
WTF, they even had different scores (with 22. ...Ke7 being the "best move")
It's all about how long the computer is set to analyze a move. It's possible the first time, the computer spent a little bit less or a little bit longer on that move, and it change it's output. I've seen situations where analysis with my own engine suggests something like Nxd5 with a score of .5, then the same with a score of -2, then e4 with a score of -1.5 then Nxd5 with a score of .43, because each time it changed it examined one ply further.
Okay, well amongst all the interesting things that the computer analysis gives, this may be the strangest.
I promoted a pawn to a queen. It was a "mistake", as the best move was the promote to a bishop (slightly better score).
The sequence that followed was for my opponent to then take the piece/queen regardless. So how can it have a different score?
Since I'm looking at this post anyway, might as well answer - it's (probably) because the engine analyzes bishop/knight, rook, then queen promotions, in that order. Because the first it analyzed was a bishop, and it didn't matter either way, it said that was the best move and the move it analyzed second was a mistake.
I don't like getting too tired to play well
by reflectivist a few minutes ago
Mate in one
by Evinadabef a few minutes ago
Concerned about trolling, again
by Master_Valek 5 minutes ago
Blunder of the Day
by fx7165 8 minutes ago
Theme keeps reverting to default chess.com
by DaveXXX 9 minutes ago
changing profile picture
by IAmAndYouAint 10 minutes ago
In Need of a Plan
by Lolada 12 minutes ago
is wesley so better then carlsen?
by gilmano 16 minutes ago
Wrong insufficient material rule
by gJKASTRIOTI 16 minutes ago
Choose: (1) ....0-0 or (2) ...Bxg2
by yeres30 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com