11131 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I just lost a Live Chess game when my opponent had just a bishop and king (I had an army of material). The game was against gramat.
Under USCF rules, this is clearly a draw because my opponent has insufficient material to force checkmate. ICC and FICS both follow this rule as well. FIDE rules may be different.
One staff member suggested that I have to press the draw button. Unlike the 3 repetition or 50 move rules, this draw should be automatic if I run out of time. The program should automatically check for mating material when someone runs out of time.
If you have an army, and he has a bishop, you can be mated.
If he has a bishop, and you have nothing, it's a draw.
That's a topic that comes up quite often (I was one of those who already brought it up when it happened to me ;)
Problem 1: The rule says it's a draw when checkmate is impossible. If you have some material other than your king on the board, a helpmate would probably be possible. So having material is a disadvantage in this case.
Problem 2: There's still the rule that the game can be claimed a draw if the opponent makes no effort to win by mate (and how should he just with B+K) but just tries to win on time. Unfortunately this rule is not valid in blitz chess (and in Internet chess neither under slower time controls because it can't be enforced).
Personally I consider it bad sportsmanship to refuse a draw in a position like that and try to score a win by "fast piece pushing", I usually send a "good sportsmanship" trophy to opponents who do this to me and hope they recognize the irony :) more can't be done about it.
That's apparently the FIDE interpretation. I could make a draw claim to the arbiter standing by. Hence, I am asking whether Chess.com follows traditional rules for Internet blitz chess or FIDE rules for classical (slow) chess.
The thing is, how do you enforce it?
Remember the famous study by V. Korolkov?
we will be using blitz rules on this-- in other words it should be a draw. however, that update to the code has not gone live yet. it will soon be a draw-- no need to claim it or click anything.
rooperi, that particular study does not present any problems as black's time cannot expire while white has only K+B.
Except where one of the Articles: 5.1.a, 5.1.b, 5.2.a, 5.2.b, 5.2.c applies, if a player does not complete the prescribed number of moves in the allotted time, the game is lost by the player. However, the game is drawn, if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player’s king by any possible series of legal moves.
and famous ruling in WWCC:
dont tell there arent any special positions where b + k can mate----come-on ---think about it
This is a case where applying classical FIDE rules to Internet blitz games is a bit awkward. It is a draw if all you have is a king or same colored bishop, but if you have more material, you lose. Of course, it should be easy to make a proper draw claim to the arbiter with the standard 30 second increment.
Blitz rules are quite different. I'm glad that Chess.com will fix it soon.
Why would Chess.com change it to be a draw, when it is still very much possible for you to be mated? Your opponent cannot force mate against you, but nor could my opponent force mate against me if I time out when we both have plenty of pieces on the board. It doesn't make sense for the game to be drawn if you flag on time, unless it is literally impossible for you to be checkmated by a legal sequence of moves.
Bit insulting don't you think?
Where do you draw the line? Let's say I have KRBvKQ, but I don't know the theory on how to hold it; can I time out and take the theoretical draw? What about a Phillidor Position, can I time out on all of those, too, and save myself having to learn drawing theory?
Let's keep going, shall we? The starting position is a theoretical draw. Not quite the same as an impossibly unlikely helpmate to occur.
Right. So answer my question: where do you suggest the line be drawn?
It's not much of a discussion, as has been said before - it's harder to accomplish in internet blitz chess where you can't ask an arbiter.
(And the line is somewhere in between your diagram, and the game under discussion).
What's your profession??
by Whip_Kitten 2 minutes ago
GM Negi's 1.e4 books appropriate for class players?
by Chicken_Monster 3 minutes ago
Epic Stonewall Attack vs Dutch
by Salimi98 3 minutes ago
Do Americans tend to flame more on live chess
by Nekhemevich 4 minutes ago
HIARCS Chess Explorer Review
by Jazanova 9 minutes ago
by charles49 14 minutes ago
John Nunn's 50 favourite puzzles
by Dadg777 16 minutes ago
Has a top grandmaster ever played on until they were checkmated?
by owltuna 17 minutes ago
What to Study
by cdowis75 20 minutes ago
Only Russian speaking! Ру
by macer75 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!