Forums

Game Drawn with N+N

Sort:
Jenium

Well, every server seems to have their own (private) rules...

Does the USCF have different rules than FIDE? Would K+N versus K+N  automatically be a draw under USCF rules?

Martin_Stahl
Jenium wrote:

Well, every server seems to have their own (private) rules...

Does the USCF have different rules than FIDE? Would K+N versus K+N  automatically be a draw under USCF rules?

I do not have the rule book in front of me, but as of the 5th edition (and I'm pretty sure it stayed the same in the 6th edition rules) I believe only way the side with the two knights would get the win is if the was a forced mate on the board. Someone may get to it before me but I can verify that later.

Jenium

Interesting...

Martin_Stahl
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Jenium wrote:

Well, every server seems to have their own (private) rules...

Does the USCF have different rules than FIDE? Would K+N versus K+N  automatically be a draw under USCF rules?

I do not have the rule book in front of me, but as of the 5th edition (and I'm pretty sure it stayed the same in the 6th edition rules) I believe only way the side with the two knights would get the win is if the was a forced mate on the board. Someone may get to it before me but I can verify that later.

OK, rule 14E deals with Insufficient Material to Win on Time.

Here is the full wording for two knights:

"14E3: King and two knights

Opponent only has king and two knights, the player has no pawns, and opponent does not have a forced win."

So, the site doesn't follow USCF rules in this instance either.

adumbrate

If black has the possibility of winning, then it is not insufficient funds. 0-1 should've been the score.