HARDER PROBLEMS

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
1st November 2009, 05:00pm
#21
by nuclearturkey
International
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 784
MaddFunn wrote:
Reb wrote:

You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?! 


I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.

It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard


I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.

1st November 2009, 05:04pm
#22
by MaddFunn
Novosibirsk Russia
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 86

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/6292009---distraction-tactics

Well on this one black isnt a complete retard, but close enough

1st November 2009, 05:07pm
#23
by ChessNinjaMaster
Eugene United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 148
nuclearturkey wrote:
MaddFunn wrote:
Reb wrote:

You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?! 


I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.

It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard


I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.


 Yes, just because you don't understand the moves doesn't mean they are bad.  Spend a little more time on the problems, and you'll see that all of the moves are forced or preventative, with no better options.

1st November 2009, 05:08pm
#24
by nuclearturkey
International
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 784
MaddFunn wrote:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/6292009---distraction-tactics

Well on this one black isnt a complete retard, but close enough


I presume you mean White, and it seems he made the best possible moves actually.

1st November 2009, 05:08pm
#25
by ChessNinjaMaster
Eugene United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 148
MaddFunn wrote:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/6292009---distraction-tactics

Well on this one black isnt a complete retard, but close enough


 What's wrong with that problem?

1st November 2009, 05:08pm
#26
by MaddFunn
Novosibirsk Russia
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 86
ChessNinjaMaster wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
MaddFunn wrote:
Reb wrote:

You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?! 


I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.

It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard


I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.


 Yes, just because you don't understand the moves doesn't mean they are bad.  Spend a little more time on the problems, and you'll see that all of the moves are forced or preventative, with no better options.


look to the example

1st November 2009, 05:11pm
#27
by ChessNinjaMaster
Eugene United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 148
MaddFunn wrote:
ChessNinjaMaster wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
MaddFunn wrote:
Reb wrote:

You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?! 


I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.

It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard


I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.


 Yes, just because you don't understand the moves doesn't mean they are bad.  Spend a little more time on the problems, and you'll see that all of the moves are forced or preventative, with no better options.


look to the example


 Like both nuclearturkey and I have said, the example has the best moves in it.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.